Home / Spending Us Blind / $100K Study to Count How Many Birds Fly Into Rebuilt Minnesota Bridge
Print Friendly and PDF

$100K Study to Count How Many Birds Fly Into Rebuilt Minnesota Bridge

Posted on April 23, 2014

At the behest of the National Park Service (NPS), the Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) is planning to spend $100,000 of federal highway funds on a study to count the number of birds that are killed flying into a rebuilt bridge over the Mississippi River.

The study would “determine the effect of bridge size and design on bird strike mortality, particularly with bridges spanning rivers and intersecting migratory flyways,” according to NPS.

This project was the result of several designs that were being considered to replace the old Hastings Bridge, located southeast of Minneapolis, including one with a high arch. The four-lane replacement bridge is “the longest free-standing tiered-arch bridge in North America,” according to Mn/DOT.

However, the NPS Mississippi National River and Recreation Area (MNRRA) expressed concern in a letter that because “the arch bridge will contain cables, there is potential for bird strike impacts.” The letter did acknowledge that because “the issue has not been carefully researched anywhere, the significance of potential bird strike impacts is unknown.”

The NPS then requested “a post-construction research project concerning bird strikes” as mitigation for the project’s potential impact on avian populations. Mn/DOT officials agreed to conduct the study when the arch bridge was chosen as their final design.

Hastings Bridge

Hastings Bridge under construction (Minnesota Dept. of Transportation)

However, bridge strikes are not even mentioned in The Sibley Guide to Birds’ list of the top causes of bird mortality. Collisions with windows and attacks by feral cats are the major causes of bird mortality, followed by high-tension wires, pesticides and cars.

MNRRA Superintendent Paul Labevitz says he was pleased that the arch design was chosen for the replacement bridge, saying the first design proposal, was “a giant dream catcher for migratory birds.”

It “had a center spire that was like 270 feet high that had cables that came off it almost like a spider web, and because of the Mississippi River flyway and the fact that this bridge was in the National Park, we were worried about its impact on migratory birds,” he told CNSNews.com.

While there is not a great deal of research on bird /bridge collisions, ornithologists’ opinions vary widely on the usefulness of such studies.

Dr. Robert Zink and Dr. Todd W. Arnold of the University of Minnesota recently co-authored a study which concluded that “collision mortality has no discernible effect on population trends of North American birds.” However, their studies did not specifically include bird/bridge collisions.

When asked about the bridge study, Zink told CNSNews.com, “We should be spending money on trying to worry about serious threats to bird populations. And yes, a few birds collide with bridges, a few birds collide with wind towers, but no one has ever thought that these are significant threats to populations.”

“A lit bridge isn’t going to be an obstacle to birds,” Arnold agreed. “Things like being scared by something else and having poor visibility, you’d need something like that to make a flock of waterfowl fly into a bridge. They wouldn’t do it otherwise.”

Continue Reading on www.cnsnews.com

Print Friendly and PDF

Posting Policy:
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.

8 thoughts on “$100K Study to Count How Many Birds Fly Into Rebuilt Minnesota Bridge

  1. I don't see this as being too much….I think we all love birds and such a small amount of money that may save birds with future bridge design is insignificant in the bigger scheme. There are much more stupid things the government spends money on…..like congress' salary!!!

  2. Phillip the Bruce says:

    This is one reason why we need to privatize the roads and end gunverment involvement.

  3. profitup10 says:

    WE need to pass this and then we will stop wasting taxpayer money – Did they study the Electric grid for bird kill oh I guess that is next for the GRANT SCIENCE University Professor elite financing plans.

  4. Holy Shirt says:

    Never let it be said that government bureaucrats are not birdbrains, nor that elected officials are not for the birds.

  5. profitup10 says:

    WE need to make DC list each item they vote on to fund this BS . . make them separate and they will go away. No more buried PORK for special interest groups and Universities.

  6. First of all how many birds are born in the structure of a bridge? I'll bet a heck of allot more than die flying into it. I don't ever remember seeing any dead birds around a bridge, but I sure have seen allot nesting birds. Second, survival of the fittest. If a bird is too stupid, or too uncoordinated to keep from flying into a bridge, it is God's way of removing it from the gene pool. Unfortunately we have a government who passes regulations to protect the stupid, lowering the quality of the gene pool and we end of with liberals, spending $100,000 on idiotic studies.

  7. Random Dude says:

    Nobody would spend $100,000 of their own money to study this, but government is perfectly happy spending other people's money on stupid things that nobody cares about. And before you say "well some people do care about it", then let them pay for the study. Like I said, nobody would pay for this with their own money.

  8. It's telling to see how Conservative and Libertarians don't care about birds when it has nothing to do with turbines.