Home / Conspiracy / Of Course the Government Is Lying About 9-11
Print Friendly and PDF

Of Course the Government Is Lying About 9-11

Written by Gary North on March 15, 2014

This month, a campaign in Canada is challenging the government’s 9-11 story. I am in favor of this, both as a professionally trained historian and as a believer in a general policy of examining official government positions.

Here is a short video on the campaign.

It is a professional looking video. It may work. Lots of people may get involved. But fewer than 4,000 people have seen it.

The group wants to get the word out. I am all in favor of getting the word out on 9-11. This could be a hook for getting the word out on other issues. People who finally figure out that they have been manipulated by the spin masters in the U.S. government are probably more prepared to accept the message that there is a long-term pattern of deception here.

The video focuses on Canada. This may work. There is a higher percentage of Canadians who think the U.S. government is willing to lie, than there is of Americans who think this. Anyway, that is my guess.

But the question occurs to me: “Who is putting up the money for this campaign?” Then this question occurs to me: “Why?”

I am a great believer in searching for historical truth. I am also a great believer in the fact that hardly anyone is committed to such a search, and of those who are, most of them don’t have much money.

When dealing with the government’s version of history, always ask this question: “Who is covering up?” But don’t forget this question: “Who is paying for this round of uncovering?” And this question: “Why?”

GETTING THE WORD OUT

Fact: it does no good to get the word out unless you have a very explicit, tightly focused program to mobilize people after you get the word out. The marketing campaign must be an extension of the mobilization plan. It must reinforce this plan. It must ignore everything that is not an aspect of this plan.

We have limited resources. It is very easy to waste resources. This is why a marketing campaign is necessary: to conserve resources. There must be a specific, measurable goal for the expenditures. There must be success indicators. There must be rapid reporting on the results of the expenditures. There must be a way of generating money from the campaign, so that there can be another follow-up campaign.

Until all this is in place, and tested on a limited, statistically representative scale, the money will disappear into the void.

Direct-response marketers understand all this. They live with it. Yet very few people understand this, and fewer still discipline themselves to follow this procedure.

People get on board a project “to get the word out” for many reasons. There is no universal pattern for joining a cause. It is too expensive to devise a separate recruiting campaign for each of these motivations. The budget is too small. The markets are too diversified. The personal motivations are too different.

(For the rest of my article, click the link.)

Continue Reading on www.garynorth.com

Print Friendly and PDF

Posting Policy:
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.

37 thoughts on “Of Course the Government Is Lying About 9-11

  1. Larry Silverstein admits WTC7 was pulled down on 9 11: http://youtu.be/UYJ1wxb_8y0 via @YouTube

  2. Longer video with explanations:

    Larry Silverstein WTC7 Controlled Demolition 7 Hours after the 911 Attack !: http://youtu.be/7OE3Adu4l0g via @YouTube

  3. mountaine says:

    This should be shown ALL OVER THE GLOBE !!!
    WAKE UP PEOPLE—-OR YOU WILL DIE !!

  4. carlee44 says:

    Like the guy says find out why this is coming up now. Its not unbelievable that it could happen but we need to know who and why exactly.

  5. I wish Canada would consider demanding when the US is going to pursue getting the living POW brought home. About 40,000 Canadians enlisted in the US military. Many of them were taken prisoner just like other nationalities. In the 1970's when Canada started to push for answers, the prime minister suddenly backed down and nothing more has been said. Rumor has it the Canadian government is in the US political hip pocket.

  6. Welcome to the new world government our politicians and military have been lying to us for a very long time. This is the real Hunger Games so wake up it is real. The elites are setting up the mass slaughter of humans so they can control not only world population but everything on our planet will be controlled by them.

  7. Mis-information. Lets do a little research on 9-11-12.

  8. redmeatstate says:

    Hmmmm….. was this insurance fraud committed by the owners of the Bldgs????????

  9. Looks like they want to blame America and give the Muslim extremists a pass. Dirt bags or morons. Probably both.

  10. punisher says:

    I'm an aircraft tech. and flight engineer. the colission svodance system computers on the aircraft where swapped out to allow the plane to be manually flown into the towers. coup#1 jet fuel does not burn hot enough to melt steel, but will melt aluminum. the towers where constructed to with stand a hit from an airliner. the buildings went straight down indicating that the main support beams where blown up. there is evidance that some of the beams had been cut to weaken them. this was planned by our own government so they could take control of the people with turning this country into a terrorist play ground so they can destroy our constitution and make this a one world order. look at the army's Obama has built. HMS, FEMA and the worst is having the United Nations with bases here in the usa. prepare for the end of america. grab your firearms and stand tall and eradicate our enemy. the government.

  11. What would we expect from a Clinton? IF (& that's a BIG 'IF') this story has ANY meret, I've been expecting nonsense like this, you libs would have to admit it was worked out during the Clinton administration. I started hearing BS like this since before the dust settled. Just like the Psychos who claim 'Hitler harmed 'No' Jews'. This is the reason Patton said," Take Lots of pictures or 50 years from now some Jackass will claim it Never happened". YEAH, so you changed your disclaiming to admitting it happened (if we are still here in 20 yrs some fools wil be claiming it never happend in the first place), just changeing it enough to Blame America. Does makeing up a bunch of maliscious lies make libs feel smart?

  12. Econoranter says:

    It would be monstrous for our government to have done the nine eleven attacks. The voters would see they had chosen presidents and members of congress of both parties who are murderously evil. It's hard to believe unless we consider the history of the behavior of politicians. Even that handful of voters who pay any attention could hardly believe it. There are some things we do that can never be admitted, even to ourselves. Choosing murderers to rule over us cannot be admitted.
    Still, it's easier for me to believe after watching presidents and members of congress of both parties destroy our economic future and the future of several generations of Americans to come by allowing the FED/Treasury to print unimaginable amounts of money, squander the money on pointless wars and domestic programs that are, over the long term even more destructive than their wars, and lie endlessly about it. An economic collapse of the kind our leaders are creating will kill thousands of times more people than 9-11 did. The lying of politicians and economists and the economic crash they are creating are only beginning and already their lying goes on day and night.
    We must remember that politicians and their allies never mind killing people, ours, theirs, no matter. They never mind stealing anyone's property either. Read a history book; that’s pretty much all they do. Maybe it’s time for constitutional government? Or do we still believe our rulers and their endless lies?

  13. I'm a retired pilot!

  14. We have never been told the truth of 9/11 event. I do not pretend to know what that truth is, but I know we have been lied to in a grand manner ? Just several points and there are many ? Why did Bldg 7 fall down and it was NOT hit by an airplane? And why has there never been any video of the plane approaching and hitting the Pentagon? Because it was not a plane , it was a missile And there are eyewitnesses that refute the plane story who were right there with feet of the supposed plane? Simple fact is that we live in massive illusions on many levels and all is just a giant control mechanism ! Should be well past obvious now that thousands of architects and engineers have come forward and banned together to show the lies and distortions of the matter. Wake up Amerika you re being completely mind effed !

  15. I hope Bush was not mixed up in this. Very disappointing. We do need to wake and pay attention. I don't trust our government either. Sad.

  16. They also need to go at least as far back as the Murrow Building destruction in Oklahoma City. Timothy McVey was tried and convicted in a hurry, but how often is a death row inmate sent to the electric chair so quickly? There are usually years of appeals before a death sentence is carried out. What did he know that was so damaging that he needed to be taken out so quickly? There are way too many questions that have never been answered. Ruby Ridge? Waco?

  17. jsccats257 says:

    Never understood the the logic behind the "US government did it" when it came to 9/11 as to who in the government, how, and why. There was the attack on the WTC in the early 90s when Bubba was in office, most of those identified as the culprits were muslim here illegally and most came in before the Bush administration took power,, the administration had no time to plan and put in place such an elaborate plot even if it wanted to and had its focus diverted in on a whole host of other issues like a transition plagued by pettiness from the outgoing administration, problems with the Senate on appointments and other issues as it flipped to the Dems when Jeffords changed parties, the like of the Chinese action with the Navy recon plane, and the beginning effects of a recession from the tech bubble bursting just to name a few. Just too much to question this "plot" mentality without addressing the conflicts on the technical aspects that get booted around.

  18. Two problems with your reply jsccat. The first is you are not addressing the article, the second is a fault in your reasoning.

    First quote: "Never understood the the logic behind the "US government did it""

    Absolutely nowhere in this article does it say the "US government did it". Go ahead and read it again, here and at the link. The title of the article explains that the US government is lying about 9-11, not that it was behind it. There are many problems with the US govt explanation for what happened that day, but that does not equal saying the "US government did it." So at best, you didn't understand what you read. Of course, odds are you didn't even bother to read the article, and at worst, you are deliberately setting up a strawman argument in order to dismiss very real problems with the US govt story.

    Second quote: "the administration had no time to plan and put in place such an elaborate plot even if it wanted to and had its focus diverted in on a whole host of other issues"

    Now again, this is all based on a premise of someone claiming the "US government did it" which is already invalid as I showed above. But your reasoning here is completely absurd and specious. How would you now how much time it takes to plan an "elaborate plot"? How do you know the Bush administration had its "focus diverted"? You don't of course. You simply can't imagine it yourself, so you assume it isn't possible.

    Frankly, the Bush administration had tens of thousands of employees going to work every day, and it only takes a few people to cook up an "elaborate plot" over the course of a week or two. The idea that everyone in the entire Bush administration was so busy working on the transition into the WH, Senate appointments, one Senator switching parties, China capturing one recon plane, and the stock market that there wasn't time for anything else is so silly it isn't remotely credible as a defense. There are no "conflicts on the technical aspects". You speak as if the White House is the President and ten other guys working in a small office.

    But again, me pointing this out doesn't mean the "US government did it."

  19. speedle24 says:

    In addition to being an aircraft tech, you are also a certifiable nut bag who can't spell. (some of the beams had been cut to weaken them). Oh my. Was it the secret service who sneaked in on Sunday evening with a few hack saws disguised as pizza delivery guys?

  20. speedle24 says:

    You don't pretend to know what the truth is but you are sure that you are being lied to????? That makes sense. And by the way there is some video of the attack on the pentagon that when slowed down clearly shows the American Airlines jet. You guys need to get a life.

  21. speedle24 says:

    If you are not accusing the U.S. government of "doing it", why are you spending so much air saying that the Bush administration COULD have done it? What is the point? Just because we cannot prove that someone could NOT have done it does not presume that they did it. Actually. I think I will pursue the theory that disgruntled eskimos from Alaska did it. You can't prove they did not.

  22. "If you are not accusing the U.S. government of "doing it","

    This is correct, I am not.

    "why are you spending so much air saying that the Bush administration COULD have done it?"

    I didn't spend any air. I spent a mere five minutes typing and a tiny fraction of bandwidth to post. It cost me almost nothing. So why not?

    "What is the point?"

    To show that jsccat was in error, and that his reply either showed he hadn't even bothered to read the article, or that he was using strawman arguments.

    "Just because we cannot prove that someone could NOT have done it does not presume that they did it."

    Precisely. And likewise, when we point out that someone is lying about a crime, that does not presume that same someone did do the crime.

    "Actually. I think I will pursue the theory that disgruntled eskimos from Alaska did it."

    Go for it! Knock yourself out.

    "You can't prove they did not."

    That's right, I can't…but you might be able to prove how many disgruntled eskimos from Alaska lived in Saudi Arabia or worked in the Bush administration.

    I look forward to reading more on your theory after you do some diligent research.

  23. 9/11 has so many flaws that don't jibe with the government story. Let's start with building 7 (WTC7). It wasn't hit by planes or structurally damaged so as to be unsafe. It suffered some office fires. It came down in a controlled demolition. Think! A controlled demolition has to be carefully planned and executed. It takes days and weeks of planning and labor intensive work to place charges and wire buildings for demolition. This building came down on the afternoon of 9/11. It was already planned for the building to come down. Think! A number of the claimed "terrorists" were known to be alive and working, pursuing careers in other parts of the world, by their family members, well after 9/11. Think! At least 2 of the planes were known to be in service and flying a year after they were supposed to be destroyed in the 9/11 incident. In the early 1950's, a bomber flew into the Empire State building in fog. Much of the wreckage of the plane was found in the streets below the building. Yet, in the case of the 2 planes that flew into the WTC buildings, they passed seamlessly into the buildings! Did you see the planes collapse and wreckage fall into the streets below? Behind the outer facade of the WTC buildings were massive steel girders.
    Those buildings were wired to come down in a controlled demolition with the hijacked planes as a cover story. Those buildings were capable of withstanding a plane crash into them and jet fuel cannot burn hot enough to melt steel. No steel building in the world that has ever suffered fire has come down from that cause. Think! Several thousand building architects, chemists, physicists, demolition experts, engineers and airline pilots have come together to say that 9/11 did not happen the way we were told. Start doing research into 9/11 on YouTube and using search engines to get you started and you'll be shocked to realize that 9/11 is a colossal hoax. The hole in the Pentagon where a plane was supposed to have hit was much, much smaller than the claimed plane. It was hit by a missile. Why was NORAD literally shutdown that day to facilitate 9/11? The day before, Rumsfeld appeared at a news conference and told us that the defense dept. could not account for 2.4 trillion, yes trillion dollars in spending. The records were in the part of the Pentagon that was destroyed. Now it can never be accounted for. What I've presented here is only the tip of the iceberg. Research it and be shocked! The truth is nearly in plain sight, obscured by a false cover story sold to us. Who did it? Why did it happen and how was it planned and carried out? The official story is not the truth.

  24. debbiebf says:

    And all the charred bodies were stage props, the smell was just stinky perfume, the parents who never came home to their kids are faking it. By the way, the Holocaust never happened and we never walked on the moon.

    I am sure that the government has issues of national security where they don't tell us everything. But really? Get a grip and let this one go. There WERE terrorists flying those planes. There WERE lots of people who never came home that night. There were funerals. And to pretend this didn't happen, or wasn't a terrorist act, or the government did it (We can't even build a website or fake a birth certificate!) or that the building were wired for destruction…. Oh come on. What a huge disservice to those who died. Let them rest in peace.

    Those of use living near the crash sites who have first and second hand knowledge can't believe the garbage you are spewing out there, knowing nothing but "what is on the internet."

    Maybe aliens did it.

  25. And now we have debbie repeating jsccat's mistakes…but on an epic scale. Seriously, did she even read any part of the article?

    "And all the charred bodies were stage props, the smell was just stinky perfume, the parents who never came home to their kids are faking it."

    Does the title of the article say 9-11 did not happen? No. Did even any of the comments suggest otherwise? No.

    So why does Debbie pretend otherwise? No idea, except possibly she doesn't want to deal with the actual article, instead she just wants to have an emotional moment.

    "By the way, the Holocaust never happened and we never walked on the moon."

    Typical solipsistic argument from a woman. These topics have nothing to do with what anyone here has said, except that these statements give her the same FEELING that mentioning 9-11 does. And really, Debbie isn't here to talk about 9-11, she is here to tell us her feelings.

    Nobody cares Debbie.

    "I am sure that the government has issues of national security where they don't tell us everything."

    And this is it. The one actual sentence from her comment which focuses on the subject of the article, as opposed to Debbie's feelings. Congratulations Debbie. Except that you botched even this. There is a difference between not telling everything, and lying. The article discusses the government lying about 9-11, not omitting details. Oh, and once again, let me emphasize. Pointing out the government is lying about 9-11 DOES NOT equal "the US government did it."

    "But really? Get a grip"

    It is Debbie that needs to get a grip…on her feelings.

    " There WERE terrorists flying those planes."

    Strawman argument, the article never said otherwise.

    "There WERE lots of people who never came home that night."

    Strawman argument, the article never said otherwise.

    "There were funerals."

    Strawman argument, the article never said otherwise.

    " And to pretend this didn't happen, "

    Strawman argument, the article never said otherwise.

    "or wasn't a terrorist act,"

    Strawman argument, the article never said otherwise.

    " or the government did it"

    Strawman argument, the article never said otherwise.

    "or that the building were wired for destruction."

    Strawman argument, the article never said otherwise.

    "What a huge disservice to those who died."

    Debbie, you have done a huge disservice to reading comprehension and rational thought. Try thinking before posting next time.

    "Those of use living near the crash sites who have first and second hand knowledge can't believe the garbage you are spewing out there"

    Save it for someone who cares Debbie.

  26. debbiebf says:

    I read the article, but it doesn't say anywhere how the government is lying, just that it is. I can't see the video. I read the comments, which are all about the gazillion crazy theories. I (apparently falsely) assumed that the comments were based on teh video since they aren't based on the article which, again, really doesn't say anything except the government has lied and some Canadians want the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.

    So again, I must ask, WHERE DO YOU SAY THE GOVERNMENT IS LYING? I agree we probably took down the plane in Pennsylvania. Then again, I don't want to burst the bubbles of those who feel their families on the plane were heroes. And it did, indeed, have to be taken down. I would have done the same, and probably lied as well given the circumstances. But the fact that it had to come down basically proves the other planes really were what the government says.

  27. Yes, research, like I won't believe any part of these storys untill someone flys another jet, fully fuled, just like the ones that were used on 9/11, into another building exactly like the twin towers … and nothing happens. Oh yeah, I DO mean an Empty Building already scheduled for destruction, or … Build one nice and strong and try it with that.

  28. Navigator30 says:

    I don't pretend to know the reason for Bldg 7 falling. However, I have studied the design of the WTC buildings and read the ASCE report. It is clear that the location of the main support members on the exterior of the building (designed to reduce wind sway) and the expansion of the horizontal beams due to the heat caused the floors involved to lose their support. This precipitated a "pancaking" scenario. The support members below were not designed to handle the impact load caused by this pancaking. The pancaking compressed the air in the floors below and the release of the air looked very much like a controlled demolition. It wasn't.

  29. mountaine says:

    Major General Smedley Butler, wrote a book, War Is a Racket !
    Smedley Darlington Butler[1] (July 30, 1881 – June 21, 1940) was a United States Marine Corps major general, the highest rank authorized at that time, and at the time of his death the most decorated Marine in U.S. history. During his 34-year career as a Marine, he participated in military actions in the Philippines, China, in Central America and the Caribbean during the Banana Wars, and France in World War I. Butler is well known for having later become an outspoken critic of U.S. wars and their consequences, as well as exposing the Business Plot, a purported plan to overthrow the U.S. government. !!!
    THIS HAS BEEN GOING ON FOR A LONG TIME…..THIS IS THE TIME TO PUT A STOP TO IT !!!

  30. mountaine says:

    YOU ARE SO RIGHT ON !!!

  31. Look at the video clips of the so-called PLANE that Crashed into the Pentagon….what plane? No plane can go so fast that it escapes a camera pointed at the impact area yet all you see in this very close view is the explosion…typical of a missile with much greater speed. Also, no plane wreckage….only an old plane engine a few blocks away….a GM engine and not an engine that is used in the Purported plane that so-called crashed into the Pentagon. Also, the area that was destroyed was the area housing records of pentagon expenses …which were called into question just day's before the "incident".

  32. debbiebf says:

    Then what happened to my friends on the plane and in the Pentagon that never came home that night? Whose bodies were in the charred wreckage (too many to account for those working in that area?) What about all the witnesses who saw the American Airlines PLANE hit the Pentagon? http://www.911myths.com/index.php/American_Airlin
    Your evidence is from what you find on the internet. Mine is from first and second-hand reports of people I know. Please look at BOTH sides of the argument on the internet. There are lies and conspiracies from the government. There are things from this crash not shared because of the Pentagon secrets or respect for the victims. But the "drone" theory is not one of them.

  33. giveitup says:

    Look at the video clips of the so-called PLANE that Crashed into the Pentagon….what plane? No plane can go so fast that it escapes a camera pointed at the impact area yet all you see in this very close view is the explosion…typical of a missile with much greater speed. Also, no plane wreckage….only an old plane engine a few blocks away….a GM engine and not an engine that is used in the Purported plane that so-called crashed into the Pentagon. Also, the area that was destroyed was the area housing records of pentagon expenses …which were called into question just day's before the "incident".

  34. Sarah PalinUnforgettable. John McCainAt this point, it sort of felt like McCain knew he was going to lose. Al Gore I just came out of a long term relationship with a guy from the south. Al Gore Saturday Night Live imagines a parallel universe where Al Gore was president.
    mens nike shox monster http://is.gd/3ZzbPf

  35. Debbie, it sounds as if you didn't notice the link that is at the end of the article text but before the comments. The article here is incomplete, the full article is on another site. I include the link again here…
    http://www.garynorth.com/public/12222.cfm

    Now interestingly enough, in the full article, it cites Flight 93, like you do, as a likely place where the government is lying. So you and the article are in agreement on that score. Also in the full article it mentions WTC7 as another likely government lie regarding how it collapsed.

    But I will tell you where the government is definitely lying. First, what is the one thing that even the most hardcore denier of any WTC conspiracy theory will never tell you? What will people like speedle and jsccats never claim? They won't say, "Well the government tested the World Trade Center rubble for explosives residue, and didn't found any evidence of explosives."

    Now before you think about that, think about this…by law, any building which is destroyed under ANY CIRCUMSTANCES other than controlled demolition…MUST BE TESTED for explosives residue. That is the law. It doesn't matter if 1 plane or 100 planes crashed into it first, the law makes no such distinction, by law samples MUST BE TAKEN AND TESTED. So why did the US government, the New York state government, and the New York city government break the law, risking criminal penalties for not testing for explosives residue? Why was all the rubble shipped off as fast as possible to China for recycling?

    I can't answer those questions, but I can tell you where the government is lying. It is lying when it says it conducted a proper investigation of the destruction of WTC and followed its own laws in doing so.

  36. thestormy says:

    John McSongbird & Snitch Kerry blocked searches for POW's many times. McSongbir admitted singing to get medical treatment at the Vietnam Officers hospital in a book he wrote. During training he wrecked 2 plains. He was being a show off when he started his engine before signaled & killed 17 Sailors & almost sinking the ship. His Naval records are sealed. This info. is found on Vietnam Veterans Against McCain.
    Kerry went before Congress telling them that our soldiers murdered children. He failed to tell them that children were rigged with bombs & sent into bases under the guise of doing work for the soldiers,or that women would ask soldiers to hold their baby & walk away for the baby to blow up in the soldiers arms.

  37. "children were rigged with bombs & sent into bases under the guise of doing work for the soldiers,or that women would ask soldiers to hold their baby & walk away for the baby to blow up in the soldiers arms."

    Show proof or it didn't happen.