Home / Federal Reserve / Politics: A Time to Lose, and a Time to Win
Print Friendly and PDF

Politics: A Time to Lose, and a Time to Win

Written by Gary North on November 6, 2013

What if Al Smith had won the presidency in 1928? The economic boom that was produced by the Federal Reserve’s expansionist policies in 1925-29 would have ended on schedule. He would have been blamed for the Great Depression in 1930-32. He would have run again in 1932. He would have lost.

Franklin Roosevelt would not have run for President in 1932. He probably would have lost a 1932 bid to be re-elected Governor of New York. (He had replaced Smith.) There would have been no New Deal. There would have been no Harry Truman.

In politics, there are times to lose. Republicans should have learned that in 1932. They should have looked back at 1928 and sighed, “if only Hoover had lost.” But politics is all about winning the next election, not the election after the next election.

The Federal Reserve is creating the conditions for the perfect storm. Under Bernanke’s reign of error, it has expanded the monetary base from $800 billion to $3.6 trillion. Today, it looks like the FED has the best of all worlds. It is counterfeiting $1 trillion a year in digital money. Interest rates are low. Despite this, the economy is barely growing. Unemployment is still over 7%. But no one in high places is blaming the FED for its policies of  monetary hyperinflation.

Meanwhile, ObamaCare is fast becoming a visible disaster. Millions of Americans have received “Dear John” letters from their insurance companies. They are losing their coverage. They cannot find comparable policies. They cannot go to www.Healthcvare.gov to find what is available.

If, on February 15, federal judge Paul Friedman announces that the promised federal subsidies to people buying health insurance on Healthcare.gov or any other federal insurance exchange are illegal, because the ObamaCare law neglected to authorize them, and if the Supreme Court upholds his decision, the Democrats will face a perfect political storm.

There are times to win an election. There are times to lose. Voters don’t know in advance when it’s time to lose. They always think it’s time to win. They are wrong.

The Tea Party has its slogan: Repeal ObamaCare. In 2014 and 2016, it is going to win with this slogan. The election in Virgina for governor has shown the way. The Republican, a Tea Party guy, was trailing Terry McAuliffe by 12 points. Then he began hammering ObamaCare. He was out-spent 2 to 1. The Republican Establishment ignored him. Yet he lost by only two percentage points.

If he had started out with just one issue — repeal ObamaCare — he would have won. He now knows this. He has said as much. “Despite being outspent by an unprecedented $15 million, this race came down to the wire because of ObamaCare. That message will go out to the entire country tonight.” These were his parting words. Too little, too late. Close, but no cigar . . . this time.

Positioning himself as a Tea Party candidate looked risky when Senator Ted Cruz read Green Eggs and Ham in his filibuster against ObamaCare. It doesn’t look risky today. It won’t in 2014 and 2016.

The country club Republicans can still win a nomination during the last months of the reign of Ben Bernanke by running against a former Democrat. They will find that Janet Yellen’s reign will not be conducive to smooth sailing.

When the perfect storm created by the FED at last hits the world economy, and when the federal government’s deficits overwhelm the bond markets, the Tea Party’s ship will come in. Until then, it is good enough to get experience running for office, from dogcatcher to county commissioner. I call this the Dogcatcher strategy. I wrote about it 13 years ago.  (Click the link.)

Continue Reading on www.lewrockwell.com

Print Friendly and PDF

Posting Policy:
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.

7 thoughts on “Politics: A Time to Lose, and a Time to Win

  1. Texas Chris says:


    2014 and 2016 will prove… Interesting.

  2. It would have been wrong, but conservatives should have forced the speed up of implementing Obamacare. Democrats own this monster and by declaring war on the 85% who had medical insurance, will have a backlash from their supporters who they lied to.

  3. Patrick Duffy says:

    This argument is like saying you should let the mob run wild, so that when enough people are killed and maimed by them, the people will rise up and vote in the righteous. Now this could happen, if the mob does not kill whoever is left, and then tyrannize those that are left. Hitler didn't stop killing his enemies once he gained power, so the idea that you should LET your enemy get his wish to punish the population with bad laws, and possibly even eliminate them, is more diabolical than the enemy itself. Good should never capitulate to evil, no matter what.

  4. AD Roberts says:

    It would be MUCH MORE EFFECTIVE, if the Tea Party would LEAVE the Repubs and go on their own. But then, they would also have to address SOCIAL issues also, from a conservative point of view.
    There is POWER in them issus. Rights of the unborn, gon owners, hetersexuals, Christians. But as long as the Tea Party refuses to address THESE issues, and refuses to LEAVE the repubs, they will NOT grow to REAL power and position.
    Tea partiers are AFRAID of the Perot effect.

    Grow a backbone.


  5. I.e., “All politics is local.” Where have I heard that before?

  6. ‘A time to lose’ is what I said after McCain & Romney loss to Obama. We will see the complete annihilation of the Left in the near future.

  7. Go to class. Repeal ignorance.