Home / Saturday Email / Is the State Department Selling Arms to Al Qaeda?
Print Friendly and PDF

Is the State Department Selling Arms to Al Qaeda?

Posted on September 26, 2013

Kit Daniels

 

The murder of Ambassador Stevens in Benghazi was an organized hit to cover up direct arm deals.

A former CIA gun runner revealed that the U.S. Ambassador to Libya, J. Christopher Stevens, was killed in the Sept. 11, 2012 attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi in order to cover up the U.S. State Department’s direct arms shipments to al-Qaeda.

William Robert “Tosh” Plumlee started his career as a CIA contract pilot in the late 1950s, delivering guns and ammunition on behalf of the agency to Fidel Castro.

Plumlee confirmed that such arm deals are still common today, with the State Dept. shipping arms to al-Qaeda via the CIA.

During an interview with Alex Jones, Plumlee pointed out that Pat Smith, the mother of an information management officer also killed during the Benghazi attack, received little information from the Obama administration about her son’s murder.

“I began to wonder ‘why won’t they tell her anything?’” He asked. “Then a contact of mine in the Middle East, a high-ranking NATO official, mentioned to me that he had reports that the ambassador [J. Christopher Stevens] had been complaining about the dispatches and cables that he had got from the State Department about the weapons being received and [Islamic] radicals armed, including Stinger missiles.”

According to Plumlee, Steven was ordered to stand down after he asked the State Department what he should do about the American arms shipments to al-Qaeda.

“The ambassador and his people had written a series of field reports and cable dispatches advising our State Department that the rebel factions had been armed with U.S. weapons,” he said. “Now my contention is this: if that is the case, why is that classified as a national security matter?”

Plumlee mentioned that Steven’s field notes have not been released by the State Department.

These revelations suggest that after Stevens told the State Dept. that he did not want al-Qaeda receiving heat seeking missiles, he was killed in the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi which was designed to take out witnesses to the arms transfer and to suppress Stevens’s reports.

The Obama administration then blamed the attack entirely on Islamic protestors enraged by the film Innocence of Muslims while refusing to answer why U.S. special forces were ordered not to aid Stevens and others during the assault.

The missiles in question, as well as the other weapons given to al-Qaeda, were transported to Libya by C-130s under the Direct Commercial Sales (DCS) program, which operates within the State Department.

As explained by New York Times best-selling author and former journalist Jim Marrs, the DCS program oversees the shipment of U.S. weapons and training to countries around the world.

Through its own internal investigations, the State Dept. admitted that firearms supplied by the DCS have ended up in the hands of foreign enemies.

Tying it all together, Plumlee stated that the weapons given to al-Qaeda were “U.S. made weapons that came from the DCS program, illegally transported by C-130s” into countries such as Turkey and Jordan and were “dispatched from CIA safe houses to the Syrian rebels.”

(For the rest of this story, click the link.)

Continue Reading on www.infowars.com

Print Friendly and PDF
Posting Policy:
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.

16 thoughts on “Is the State Department Selling Arms to Al Qaeda?

  1. Now the Benghazi thing is clear. It is all about a real cover-up, not just malfeasance of rescuing these people.

    • DenverKitty says:

      And who is surprised by all of this?

    • I want to know why the senate and now the congress are seeking exemption from the health care laws they think are great for everyone other than them and their staff. The politicians are not worried about Obama care because as Obama said when asked was he going to be covered by the same insurance and he said no hh has the best insurance in the world. Didn't he say he wanted to spread the wealth?
      He and Jay z sit around having billions and saying how bad it is on the poor people. Did they say they would take the same thing that is being forced on the poor unfortunate class? Did they say they would just keep a million or two and put the rest on the deficit? I didn't think so.

  2. It's wrong to accuse the state department of selling weapons to Al Qaeda. Obama is GIVING weapons o Al Qaeda.

    • I really don't believe they were accusing the State dept. or rather they weren't accusing the ambassador, but I was pretty sure all along that it all had something to do with arming the enemy. The things they are trying to pull in Syria are much the same, they are wanting us to arm the rebels who are really our enemy. You do know that we put Huessien in power don't you?

  3. Al Qaeda is the "Emmanuel Goldstein" of the Bush-Obama years. Apologies to George Orwell.

  4. We have known since he first appeared Obama is an agent of change. Many of us felt it was not a change for good for America. Now it is visible to everyone, he is supporting the worldwide Muslim agenda with American dollars. The time is now. Impeach him or annul his appointment, then arrest and charge him and his cohorts with High Treason. Take him out of the way and restore Americans in charge of government departments. We will soon have enough evidence to convict him and every one of his cronies, including Hillary and her Muslim Brotherhood aide. We need an overhaul of the political candidates and voting machines and procedures before another election puts a replacement enemy of America in office anywhere.

  5. It's time for an ethical journalist to earn a Pulitzer Prize by exposing these schemes in documented detail. I sure would like to know WHY we give/ship deadly weapons to our known, sworn enemies. The State Department does seem to be working in direct opposition to what is best for our country. Do they think this advances the United Nations somehow?

    • Fiction or fact – people, these days only believe what they want to believe. (Global warming, for example)
      Too bad Vince Flynn is dead – this has the makings of one of his typical CIA thrillers.

  6. marjorie kinne says:

    We now are seeing "GOVERNMENT EVIL, ALWAYS EVIL" Who gets the pay off? Not me or you but WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO?

    • My personal theory is that the international banks that own the Fed (this part is verifiable fact) are in favor of the NWO and a stronger role for the U.N. Part of this consolidation of power and international redistribution of wealth seems to include a decision by these powers that the Muslim Brotherhood should rule in the Arab (and other) nations. What I'm not sure about is how having the Muslim Brotherhood in power would increase the role of central banks in even more countries. I suspect that mutually advantageous agreements have been made in the areas of political control and power and in sharing of huge amounts of cash. Much of that is presently in the hands of the U.S. and Arab kingdoms. That can be taken away and redistributed. Follow the money (and power over others).

  7. and to think the joint chiefs of staff are all for it. it is a wonder why the they want the enemy well armed to kill USA soldiers. but then again the sheoples of amafrika welcome obamacare which will be the new age death camps for them. what a paradox.

  8. Do not know the answer but being It is illegal to sell the arms to terrorist or enemies so we must just give them away.

  9. What sort of government is running my country? I've heard about covering up a paper trail but this is something much more sinister. Americans who are calling for help and who are denied help are just collateral damage in the cover up of arming our enemies, al Qaeda. The same al Qaeda who flew air carriers into the Twin Towers. So we eliminate those involved in arms shipments to our enemies, coerce survivors into silence, and then say, "Get over it!" And those are the words of our next president. Then to assure that we can continue to send military supplies to our enemies, al Qaeda, the law which forbids arming terrorist is waived. I really doubt that there will be another president in 2016 because my country probably won't last that long.

  10. old_salty_dawg says:

    The answer is NO they are not Selling them the arms in Direct Violation of American Law and what Obama himself put into place they are FLAT OUT GIVING THEM ARMS. Obama and Kerry are Nothing but TRAITORSOISTS in Libya they killed 4 Americans. He helped them in Egypt and the body count is still rising. Now he is doing it in Syria and we will NEVER know how many will die. Obama is hiding the TRUTH about the Sarin Attack and the World knows it. The Rebels were the ones who used that POISON GAS on the [people who died in Damascus not Assad and Obama is IGNORING those FACTS to push help for his TERRORIST BUDDIES. He is doing this to put his Pals in power throughout the Middle East and Northern Africa in what I believe is an attempt to become UN Sec. Gen. after leaving the White House.

  11. The state department is selling guns to islamic terrorist as well as selling guns to the drug cartels. All this is done as the CIA imports drugs and sells them in the streets of America, to help control the people. Wall Street then takes the drug money and launders the drug money and putting the money safely back into secret coffers of the Federal Government. All this is accomplished with the over-site of America`s Department of Justice watchful eye, giving it the illusion of being legal. All this is done while thousands of Americans are incarcerated on drug charges plus killing each other in our streets over drug territories.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title="" rel=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>