Home / Congress / Incumbents’ Achilles’ Heel: Their Vote on Congress’s Exemption from ObamaCare
Print Friendly and PDF

Incumbents’ Achilles’ Heel: Their Vote on Congress’s Exemption from ObamaCare

Written by Gary North on September 24, 2013

Congress has voted to cover all health insurance premium increases of their staffs, due to ObamaCare. The staffers were going to quit.

Some Congressmen and Senators argued publicly for an exemption.

What will happen to them in November 2014 if their opponents use this against them?

Maybe nothing, if their opponents in the primary use it against them. That’s because they will not make it to the general election in November.

As Ed McMahon used to ask Johnny Carson, “How bad is it?”

The poll data is clear and cuts across party lines: 92 percent of the public does not think it is right that Congress and their staff are letting the Obama administration exempt them from the costs of Obamacare. Yet it seems many in Congress still want to dismiss these findings in hopes that these sentiments won’t translate into actual voter preferences.

Incumbents facing reelections shouldn’t fool themselves. A recent real-world deployment of the issue shows it can powerfully impact candidates’ prospects.

We tested the effect of the congressional exemption issue in six different 2014 races, which represent different election archetypes. We launched incumbent-specific, small but targeted, week-long communications campaigns, using mail, phones and internet, (but no TV or radio), directed at 7,500 likely voters. Then we analyzed the criteria regularly used by campaign strategists to measure the strength of an incumbent’s reelection campaign: the “hard re-elect”, or the percentage of voters who say they will vote to reelect the incumbent; the “hard vote against”, or the percentage of voters who say they will vote against an incumbent; and the “ballot test”, or how the incumbent fares when matched up against his challenger.

The incumbents against whom we tested the issue were: Sen. Mark Udall, Democrat from Colorado; Sen. Mary Landrieu, Democrat from Louisiana; Sen. Lindsey Graham, Republican from South Carolina; Rep. John Tierney, Democrat from Massachusetts; Rep. Jim Matheson, Democrat from Utah; and U.S. Rep. Mike Simpson, Republican from Idaho.

First archetype: How would the issue play in a GOP primary election, if the incumbent had taken the special exemption? We tested the case of Lindsey Graham, who already has three announced GOP primary challengers. After one week of messaging to the target universe, our after-action survey showed that his hard reelect number dropped 14 points, from 32/68 to 25/75; his hard vote against grew by 14 points, from 18/82 to 25/75; and he lost 12 points on the ballot test.

But wait! There’s more! Click the link.

Continue Reading on www.weeklystandard.com

Print Friendly and PDF

Posting Policy:
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.

One thought on “Incumbents’ Achilles’ Heel: Their Vote on Congress’s Exemption from ObamaCare

  1. Glynnice Self says:

    OBAMACARE was specifically designed by its creators to stifle and subsequently destroy the American economy.
    And it shows every evidence of doing exactly that – the evidence being the TRUE measure of number of people fully employed, not downsized to part time only. Main stream media and govt. polls show anyone with a job as being great measure of IMPROVED economy – they ignore the reduced hours, pay, & previous benefits (prior to Obamacare) as a convenient oversight.
    Everyone that has ever read "THE COMMUNIST MANIFESTO" by Karl Marx knows that government 'sponsored' healthcare systems are designed specifically with that sabotaging purpose in mind. Such deliberate destruction of a nation's economy is constructed with the intent to manipulate the populace into begging the government to take over all aspects of people's lives.In other words, THE GOVERNMENT DELIBERATELY CREATES THE PROBLEM to increase governmental power, especially to the governing "elite" becoming ever more powerful. All of Obama's executive orders verify that is his intent.