Home / Economic Conditions / PIMCO Loses $41 Billion in Withdrawals
Print Friendly and PDF

PIMCO Loses $41 Billion in Withdrawals

Posted on September 6, 2013

With investors anticipating the end of the Federal Reserve’s stimulus program, the biggest mutual fund in the world, Pimco’s Total Return Fund, took a $41 billion hit over the past four months after losses and withdrawals, according to Morningstar.

The $292 billion fund has shrunk to $251 billion, a reduction of 14 percent, since May, the month that Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke told Congress that the central bank’s $85 billion in monthly asset purchases could begin to wind down toward the end of the year. The Federal Open Market Committee’s next meeting is set for Sept. 17 and 18.

Launched in 1987 by “Bond King” Bill Gross, Pimco’s Total Return Fund has been a reliable standout—beating an average of 75 percent of its peers in each year of the past decade. So far this year, however, 87 percent of similar funds have better returns.

Broad bond indexes have declined this year on speculation that the Fed’s easy-money policies, known as quantitative easing, will begin to tighten. Bond prices fall when yields rise, and yields on 10-year U.S. Treasuries have climbed to 2.97 percent from 1.76 percent at the start of the year.

Continue Reading on www.businessweek.com

Print Friendly and PDF

Posting Policy:
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.

One thought on “PIMCO Loses $41 Billion in Withdrawals

  1. There's a caveat on each prospectus or ad for a fund: "Past performance is no guarantee of future results." But funds advertise on the basis of their past performance, and investors buy or sell based on past performance. The fact that 87% of similar funds did better this past year totally explains the drop in fund capitalization. It's a completely expected outcome. In fact, as a percentage lost, Total Return fund did rather well, IMHO. Many other funds suffer greater percentage losses on similar records.