Home / Civil Rights / Snowden, Spies, and “Network” (1976)
Print Friendly and PDF

Snowden, Spies, and “Network” (1976)

Written by Gary North on June 17, 2013

“I want Snowden here by noon. Have Lester cover the CIA hearings. And give the White House to Doris.”

This bit of dialogue in Network, the black comedy written by Paddy Chayefsky, appears about 9 minutes and 45 seconds into the movie. This introduces us to the working day of a news team of a television network.

Chayefsky was the greatest television screenwriter in the golden age of television. With Network, he became the greatest screenwriter in anti-television history. There has never been anything like it in terms of dialogue. The movie won four Oscars: best original screenplay, best actor, best actress, and best supporting actress for the shortest scene that ever won an Oscar. It should also have won best supporting actor: Ned Beatty’s “Mr. Beale” speech, which I regard as the greatest dialog scene in the history of the movies. Beatty got a nomination for the scene.

But in terms of prophetic accuracy, nothing matches this: “I want Snowden here by noon. Have Lester cover the CIA hearings. And give the White House to Doris.”

The movie was about the audience ratings for a network news department, and what a news department was willing to do to get higher ratings. The Obama White House now faces the possibility that by extraditing Edward Snowden and putting him on trial for espionage, it will create a network news sensation: a media circus that will keep this story in front of the public for months. The White House does not want that. But America needs it.

Snowden keeps upping the ante.

The Guardian newspaper says the British eavesdropping agency GCHQ repeatedly hacked into foreign diplomats’ phones and emails when the U.K. hosted international conferences, even going so far as to set up a bugged Internet cafe in an effort to get an edge in high-stakes negotiations.

The report — the latest in a series of revelations which have ignited a worldwide debate over the scope of Western intelligence gathering — came just hours before Britain was due to open the G8 summit Monday, a meeting of the seven biggest economies plus Russia, in Northern Ireland. The allegation that the United Kingdom has previously used its position as host to spy on its allies and other attendees could make for awkward conversation as the delegates arrive for talks.

“The diplomatic fallout from this could be considerable,” said British academic Richard J. Aldrich, whose book GCHQ charts the agency’s history.

GCHQ declined to comment on the report.

“No comment” is the preferred agency response these days to each new revelation by Snowden. The story is here. Matt Drudge made it his lead story early on June 17: “Snowstorm.”

Indeed, it is exactly that. Snowden has let the cat out of the bag. He is not threatening America’s security, contrary to Attorney General Holder, who refused to name him. But he is surely threatening the White House’s security from public scrutiny.

The White House is waiting for the Snowden story to die down. But Snowden keeps letting more cats out of bags. He is keeping the surveillance community in the spotlight. Now he has broadened it to Great Britain.

The United States government has yet to demand that Hong Kong extradite him. To demand his extradition, the government must accuse him of a crime. It must then try him. If it tries him, an international media feeding frenzy will begin. How much does Snowden know? No one in high places knows. He knows a lot more than any other whistleblower on the spy network who has gone public before.

He has already become a worldwide phenomenon. The government cannot get this toothpaste back into the tube. But if it extradites him, it will have to try him. It is sure to get a lot more toothpaste out of the tube.

Edward Snowden is the equivalent of John Dean. The more he talks, the worse it gets for the White House.

The story will die down eventually, but the White House does not know when. It is to the advantage of the White House that it die down soon. But Snowden is keeping it alive with new revelations. Now he is getting the story to new audiences.

He is causing great embarrassment to the spies. He is showing that domestic populations are the main target, not foreign terrorists. He is showing that the agencies are unleashing their digital tracking technologies on their own populations, or — in the case of Great Britain — the international diplomatic services. This will pit agencies against agencies.

So far, the government has refused to ask for his extradition. The White House is trapped: he will not shut up. But giving him new opportunities to tell more of his story to the public is a real threat to the government’s credibility.

How much toothpaste is still in the tube?

Continue Reading on news.nationalpost.com

Print Friendly and PDF

Posting Policy:
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.

11 thoughts on “Snowden, Spies, and “Network” (1976)

  1. Rabelrouser says:

    Snowden pulled back the curtian on a agenda that was supposed to never be seen, for its own purposes; which most will reconize as a controlling agenda. He has become the hero and the villian , depending on the view point.
    His existance further allows the truth to be the problem and to further that existance in the public spotlight complicates the "agenda" further.
    So should there be a situation that emperils his life and his ability to be the revealer, it could easily be assumed that his words held truth.
    Will the "tail wag the Dog"? in the near future to provide a conveinent cover, remains to be seen; but should be expected.
    But the public needs to continue the discussion and force its existance in the light of day. That for now is only one way to protect itself.

  2. MetaCynic says:

    Snowden might even have in his possession the mother of all secrets which can blow the American empire and the entire national security state to bits – 9/11 was a false flag operation, an inside job. He could start to name people – well known people.

    There is considerable evidence out there for those with open minds to review, that the three WTC towers were brought down with controlled demolition. 9/11 was a major turning point in American history. It was the excuse for the rapid acceleration of non stop warfare overseas and the erection of a domestic police state to erode our liberties at home. The revelation that 9/11 was an inside job would shatter what little remains of Americans' respect for and trust in government.

  3. Ignatius says:

    9/11 was a false flag operation carried out by the Israelis, and certain Americans in positions of power aided and abetted them. Check out the book by Christopher Bollyn, "Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World".

  4. Gary, I didn't realize you decided to stop being an "economist" and start being a conspiracy peddler. But hey, whatever works to bring in the advertising revenue and website hits, right?

  5. Education Needed says:

    @Shane. Some people deal with reality and some people deal in fantasy. Which category are you in? In other words, trolls ONLY live in fancy. HAHAHAHA. Education is needed but honesty and truth are needed even more. I don't s'pose you know what conspiracy means? Get real….

  6. Shane you need to read North's book on conspiracies and get informed! Otherwise, you simply appear as a foolish troll! I am embarrassed even reading your idiocies! I am blushing for you at the moment as I type.

  7. Shane, I can always count on you to bring some contentless 7th-grade taunt to the discussion. Thanks for not disappointing me.

  8. There's only one fly in this ointment (possibly): That Snowden isn't what he seems, that he's a CIA plant for instance. This issue has been raised by several commentators, notably Jon Rappoport, Naomi Wolf, and Anthony Wile of the Daily Bell. The gist of their argument is that Snowden is way too cool, way too slick, and has the media manipulation stuff down cold. Also, the very fact that the MSM is giving this so much airtime is making some people suspicious. Scary to think they may be right. Frankly, I hope Snowden is the genuine article, but what if this is all theater?

  9. awkingsley says:

    Snowden for Congress in 2014!

  10. He could be part of a Hegellian Dialectic exercise, pitting one viewpoint against another. After the pitting, the key people who lead the sheep in the media start bleating the outcome they want you to come to. They bleat the desired viewpoint more and more, then BINGO….you've been led to the conclusion they desired.

    In order to pull that off, they need to put out the bait, the opposing viewpoint at which to TILT. AND TILT WE DID. But, we know better than to follow the bleating to their end conclusion…..which is….1) that whistleblowing is Bad, Traitorous, possibly worthy of jail or even firing squad, and 2) that NSA data mining and no-warrant snooping is OK – hey, it's OK says both the right and the left. Well (snark ON), if it's ok by them, then it must be ok by me.

    We know better. 4th Amendment rights are real. Orwell was right. Big Brother is bad. Whistleblowing crimes is good. To he__ with the Hegellian Dialectic hypnotists!

  11. Seymour Kleerly says:

    No-warrant snooping?