Home / terrorism / Karzai Says U.S. Is Holding Talks with the Taliban
Print Friendly and PDF

Karzai Says U.S. Is Holding Talks with the Taliban

Written by Gary North on March 11, 2013

This is called biting the hand that feeds you.

Mr. Karzai sees the handwriting on the wall. Obama has said he will withdraw the troops.  This means the Taliban will once again run Afghanistan. Mr. Karzai will not. That is because Mr. Karzai will be gone, one way or another: either by plane or by a more colorful mode of departure.

Alexander the Great came and went. So did the Mongols. So did the British. So did the Russians.

More of them came than departed. That is the #1 lesson of conquering Afghanistan. But managers of empires seem not to learn it.

The managers hire puppets. The puppets strut across the stage for as long as the empires keep the strings moving. But, in every case, the empires cut the strings and departed. Then the puppets had a problem.

Mr. Karzai is a puppet. His strings are about to be cut.

I wrote the following on September 16, 2001. It was published on September 17, 2001 on Lew Rockwell’s site.

Let’s review a little well-known history. In 1989, the Soviet Union retreated from Afghanistan. Within two years, there was no longer any Soviet Union. The shock of that defeat undermined the legitimacy of the Soviet Empire. A decade earlier, their tanks had rolled down the highway from the border into Kabul. They surrounded the city of Kabul with their tanks in one day. What good did this do them? None. It cost them their empire.

Now let’s review a little unknown history. Think about maps again. How did the Soviet Union drive 30-ton tanks from the edge of what used to be the USSR into Kabul in just one day? How did tanks get through the mountains? Did they drive down a paved highway? Well, as a matter of fact, they did. It had been built 13 years earlier by 8,000 Afghans under the supervision of Russians. Here’s the capper: the project was paid for by the United States. It was a joint construction project. This was reported in the November 3, 1966 issue of the Engineering News-Record, “Rugged Afghan Road Jobs Fill Gaps in Trans-Asia Network.” (I may be one of only two people in the world who clipped that article for his files in 1966. The other was the person who sent me the photocopy.)

So, while 55,000 American troops were dying in Vietnam, battling a tiny nation funded by the USSR, President Johnson was building the road that the Soviets used in 1979 to invade Afghanistan. There should have been a sign at the side of the road: “Americans’ tax dollars at work.”

As it turned out, that was the best money this country spent on the Cold War. It was like a giant neon sign that read, “Come and get it!” The Soviets came, and they got it. Now it’s our turn.

Then I offered this assessment:

There are only two ways to fight terrorism with any hope of success: (1) implacable, unrelenting counter-terrorism through endless law-breaking; or (2) unrelenting, implacable justice and the rule of law and liberty. The first approach can bottle up terrorism for a time, but any perceived slackening of the campaign leads to defeat. This nation had better choose the second way.

This nation chose the first way. The voters demanded it. Now they get to pay for it.

It is now 2013. We are still there. Obama will slowly pull out the troops. We clearly have lost the war. There was no doubt in my mind in 2001, that we would lose this war. The federal government has spent over $640 billion dollars in Afghanistan so far, to lose a war that clearly could not be won.

Americans put little American flags on their cars in 2001. Bush demanded war. The voters demanded war. They got what they wanted, good and hard.

They also got the Department of Homeland Security. Then they got the National Defense Appropriation Act of 2011.

The total cost of federal money spent on the wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Pakistan is about $3.2 trillion, but we’re not 100% out of any of them yet. The cost of our mercenaries in Iraq continues to mount.

Meanwhile, Karzai blames us.

He will not be around much longer to blame anyone.

Continue Reading on www.bloomberg.com

Print Friendly and PDF

Posting Policy:
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.

8 thoughts on “Karzai Says U.S. Is Holding Talks with the Taliban

  1. Carl D Sedillo says:

    The newly appointed Secretary of State met with Vietnam Communists in France during the Vietnam engagement. It isn't a bit surprising the present Administration would attempt to do something similar. When PRESIDENT TRUMAN engaged North Koreans crossing the demarcation line. Democrats were in a huff and almost mustered the strength to kick the President out of office. How DARE a Democrat war against a communist nation!!!!! President Kennedy increased the number of Military Advisors in Vietnam and received nothing but grief from his own Party. He traveled through the streets of Dallas at a time when there was a great deal of speculation he might not be reelected. The car top that might have saved his life was not on the vehicle when he was shot because he wanted people to see him and hopefully vote for him. The constant rap by the Left insisting we become a communist state by those attending the university of our choice is but another example of where the Country may be headed. My only hope is Obamacare becomes operational. When all of those Libs learn about illness by appointment that is commonplace in Europe and in our Military they just may wake up to the REAL WORLD. Have a great day;.

  2. parklitch212 says:

    This is the endgame of George Bush's attempt to "nation-build". If he had gone in and done what he went in for, he'd have been out of there in 2 years, and and there would be no need to worry about al-caida ever re-grouping in that country. But the neo-cons had to turn the search for bin-Laden into a private contractor-profiting, never-ending conflict that they never had an ending for that turned out well for anybody.
    This is our 21st Century's Viet Nam, 13 years and counting, thousands of American lives lost, Billions of dollars spent , and no proper way to end it. There will be countless Afghans being slaughtered when we bug out.
    We never learn.

  3. Bob Marshall says:

    When the US led forces invaded Afghanistan they discovered that Afghanistan was wealthier than they could have ever imagined. Maps left behind by the retreating Russians revealed the locations of nearly 1 trillion dollars worth of natural untapped resources. At the time,General David H. Petraues, Commander of Central Command stated that there is huge potential here. Huge veins of iron, copper, cobalt, gold and most importantly lithium.Then there is the TAPI proposed pipeline which would be detrimental to US interest if it goes forward. The Taliban, before the US invasion had reduced the production of opium from their poppy fields to 10%. in a few short years the US raised it to 90%. Our troops still guard those fields today. Why would the US leave Afghanistan?

  4. one of the reasons for benghazi was obozos gun running to alquaida so it wouldn't suprise me if he was coluding with them in Afghanistan

  5. Never under estimate the Stupidity of people in large group's. If your a left wing libterd you won't be able to figure out what that mean's. To my Fellow Patriot's and Constitutinalist'shave a wonderful day, our day is coming to right the wrong's of the left

  6. ANYONE who is potentially considering a "deal" with the U.S. Government should take into account the history of the United States and it's many "deals" and treaties with foreign governments!! Particularly the Native American Indians!! Currently, the US Gov is running several scams called "social security," "healthcare", "Income tax", and the "federal reserve". I would go so far as to claim, although I couldn't prove it other than Barney Frank and Fannie Mae, that EVERY government agency is a looting platform that directly benefits criminal politicians, primarily of the Democratic Party. Yeah, big claim, I know, but I'm convinced of it. Why do you think they keep them alive???

  7. Karzai has his facts right , the whole Benghazi was a coverup for the coverup of supplying arms and weapons to the taliban .

  8. Karzai will be gone, but with billions that he bilked out of the American taxpayer. Hopefully, when he is gone, we will prosecute him.