Home / Politics / The Loss of Trust in Political Leaders
Print Friendly and PDF

The Loss of Trust in Political Leaders

Written by Gary North on January 18, 2013

Gary North’s Reality Check (Jan. 18, 2013)

When Ron Paul left the House of Representatives, this created a vacuum. Libertarians only had two representatives over the last 60 years: Howard Buffett and Ron Paul. That is not a lot of representatives. These days, the conservative movement seems as bereft of leaders in Congress as the libertarians are. We hear soundbites from Marco Rubio, and Rand Paul is also quoted from time to time, but there is no one who has the conservatives’ ear in the way that Jesse Helms did a generation ago.

Leadership is important in every institution, but its absence becomes visible rapidly in the field of national politics. We do not think much about the fact that we cannot name the CEOs of America’s 10 largest companies. We probably do not even know which companies these are. Business leaders tend not to be well known in the general population. The few exceptions to this, such as Bill Gates and Steve Jobs, are rarities. I have no objection to this. I do not think it is a job of business leaders to spend time and money on becoming national figures unless this is going to increase revenues for the company. There have been a few like this. Colonel Sanders is an obvious example. But it was his company. Dave Thomas of Wendy’s restored the company’s flagging sales with his TV advertisements. People believed in him. Lee Iacocca had a similar effect in the early 1980s on the sales of Chrysler products. But this is not normal.

THE DEARTH OF POLITICAL LEADERS

When you cannot find political leadership, this is generally an indication that the political system is either in gridlock or chaos. When no single leader becomes the spokesman for a particular ideology, that ideology is surely on the defensive. If a group of ideas is not associated with a particular individual who articulates these ideas, the spread of these ideas is hampered.

In the 1930s and 1940s, there were famous leaders. Franklin Roosevelt was one of them; Adolf Hitler was one of them; Joseph Stalin was one of them; Winston Churchill was one of them. They represented gigantic populations. They took us into World War II. There has never been a degree of leadership internationally comparable to the era of World War II. Of course, given the effects of World War II, this is probably an advantage.

A generation later, we had Margaret Thatcher, Ronald Reagan, Deng Xiaoping, and, most improbably, Pope John Paul II. Except for the threat of nuclear war, the stakes were much lower in the 1980s than they were in the 1940s. The level of leadership, meaning the level of commitment by their followers, was not at the same level as it had been during the great crisis of the Great Depression and World War II. That also was a good thing.

Today, because the threat cannot be personified, the level of commitment to national leaders is almost nonexistent. There is a war against terrorism, but that war has no visible leaders. There is also no way of knowing who is winning and who is losing. There are not even criteria available for what would constitute victory. So, without personified leaders on the other side of the conflict, the level of commitment is less.

PERSONIFIED EVIL

During the Great Depression, a national leader could personify his enemies. Hitler was the obvious example. Everything wrong with the economy he blamed on the Jews. Stalin had the same approach with respect to failures in the Soviet economy. He blamed the failures on the wreckers. These were sometimes latent capitalists, and sometimes they were followers of Leon Trotsky. There was always some malevolent force within the system that was keeping the system from working.

Franklin Roosevelt blamed his fellow rich bankers, the people he had sold bonds to from 1921 to 1929. He called them money changers in the Temple and “malefactors of great wealth.” Nevertheless, it was pretty hard to keep blaming them, and taxing them, and still blaming them, when the economy got no better.

Then came World War II, when leaders could easily personify evil enemies. It is easier to be a national political leader during a major war in which the stakes are high. But wars eventually come to an end. Losing leaders depart. In Churchill’s case, the winning leader departed. The Labor Party won in 1945. He got the boot.

Today, no national leader seems to be able to target any particular group that is solely to blame for the economic crisis. The biggest beneficiaries have obviously been the big bankers. The bailout saved them. No national leaders are going after them in public. But if you cannot blame the big bankers, or the greedy capitalists, or CEOs whose pay is too high, and make it stick politically, who are you going to blame?

If you cannot figure out who to blame, you cannot present a plausible political program to restore prosperity by placing the bad guys under restraints. Therefore, there is not much that leaders can do to demonstrate that they are successful leaders in the war against the bad economy. They just keep promising that things will get better. How, they do not say.

A LOSS OF TRUST

This is why the present situation is steadily undermining the public’s sense of trust in national leaders. There is virtually nobody in Congress that large numbers of voters seem to trust. There is nobody in Congress with a separate movement behind him, people ready to sacrifice on behalf of the message of this leader. There is no Ted Kennedy. There is no Jesse Helms. Without Teddy, the Right has trouble raising money with scary fund-raising letters. Without good old Jesse, the Left has trouble raising money.

At some point, the public is going to figure out that there is something fundamentally flawed with the system. It is not possible to identify individuals or special-interest groups that are specifically at fault for the bad economy. National leaders cannot figure out a way to restore economic growth and a strong job market. Voters are going to lose faith in deliverance. They do not know who or what is capable of overcoming the economic problems that every large nation seems to be facing.

Without hope of deliverance, the voters lose confidence in politics as a means of healing. This is the central religion of our era. This trust is waning. The Keynesian system holds on power by default. There is no widely shared faith in what can be substituted and how.

(For the rest of my article, click the link.)

Continue Reading on www.garynorth.com

Print Friendly and PDF

Posting Policy:
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.

24 thoughts on “The Loss of Trust in Political Leaders

  1. Seymour Kleerly says:

    A great day for America. We're coming back strong!

  2. Political leader not fear with national public and they must be educate the people who voting them and we are providing custom essay writing for maximum success online. we are promoter of education system online.

  3. This is too informative. i like your post. thanks for share

  4. A more deeper and staged knowledge would be good for me …

  5. Politician word is now becoming an abuse in most of countries because the performance is very unexpected. The ruins the law and wasting the money of the people.
    Tourism Companies in dubai

  6. Politics become a very Beneficial business. Not all but many politicians come into politics to make money. Due to this politician loss their dignity in people. Politicians should take steps on corrupt politicians and punished them.
    wigs toronto

  7. A patriotic Politician can run a nation and takes it to on the peak. But nowadays it's been rare to find a patriotic politician. A party is the spokesperson of any party but after taking Oath they should personify and choose their favorite people that are capable for the post.

  8. People think that political leaders are the main hope for the patriotism and the economic development of the country or the state but now a days we found that the personal interest is the main focus of every politician in spite of he become the spokesperson of the state by taking the oath of the leadership.

  9. search engine optimization consultants are the best peoples helping organizations to improve the ranking of their products in all search engines. If you want that your site and your product will always be at top of all search engines follow the link and get your desire fulfilled.

  10. I believe that you recognize how to construct people pay attention to what you have to pronounce, particularly with a concern that’s so vital. I am pleased to suggest this blog.

  11. instantly amazed with all the useful information that is on it. Great post, just what i was looking for and i am looking forward to reading your other posts soon!

  12. Allen Peterson says:

    Good to read

  13. Micky James says:

    The political leaders lose their trust because they don't fulfill their promises which they do with public before elected to any seat. You describe comprehensively how people lose their trust upon political leaders but students can still rely upon best writing services of the world and check out this site who get online writing services about this. It is best tip for easy completion of your assignments.

  14. Women’s makes lots of changes in their clothes because the nature and mod of women changes anytime and they always like to wear trendy and fashionable dresses.

  15. Well somehow I got to read lots of articles on your blog. It’s amazing how interesting it is for me to visit you very often.

  16. Always has really good posts and topics please keep it up! loads of blogs are going under lately from lack of new posts etc

  17. thanks ..i have bookmarked it already

  18. Great site. I add this Post to my bookmarks.

  19. I harmonize with your conclusions and will thirstily look forward to your approaching updates

  20. I’m very fired up to show it to anyone. It makes me so satisfied your vast understanding and wisdom have a new channel for trying into the world.

  21. Great site. I add this Post to my bookmarks.

  22. I harmonize with your conclusions and will thirstily look forward to your approaching updates

  23. I truly like your style of blogging. I tag it to my favorites internet site list and will be checking back soon. Please check out my web site also and let me know what you think.

  24. Great site, continue the good work,is also very helpful to people, is worth us learning,your article is really Great job!