In the media, the code word for “black gangs” is “young men.”
The Baltimore police are trying to locate a group of 8 “young men” who beat a white man so severely that he is in a coma.
A black man who witnessed the beating says they were just trying to cause trouble.
The police say the motive may have been robbery. Of course it may have been. Eight “young men” beat a guy into a coma. He kept saying he did not want to fight. But the “young men” kept beating him,. Then one of them kicked him in the head.
Robbery. Yes. The police will look into this.
Black citizens in the area say they want these criminals off the streets. But that would mean that someone would have to identify them. This is not allowed. The public is not allowed to see the videos of the beating — just the police. The police are not releasing the videos for the public to identify.
I wonder why not.
Fred Reed, always politically incorrect, told us why not three weeks ago.
Now we have the wave of savage attacks by gangs of blacks against whites. As any sentient being has noticed, the government and the media diligently hide these attacks. At least, the media have done so in the past. If feral blacks beat a white man into brain damage, we hear that it was done by teenagers, or youths, or children (Whites are about half of the population of Washington, DC, and the rest are teenagers.) Race determines press coverage. But the censoring works less well now.
The flies in the ointment of suppression are the cell cam, the surveillance camera, and the internet, the only free press we have. Increasingly footage of these racial attacks appears on the web. Interestingly, more of it appears on television than was the case in the past. The news presenter will still speak of the perpetrators of flash-mob robberies as “youths” but sometimes will also show the video from the surveillance camera. This is not accidental. The rules are changing.
I once thought that the reporters playing this game of hide the racial Easter egg knew of the intense hatred for whites prevalent in the black underclass and feared that if whites knew what was going on, and reacted, an explosion would occur. This seemed to me at least arguably the best course in the face of an intractable problem. Yet many reporters, especially women, regard any notice taken of misbehavior by blacks as morally contemptible. They aren’t cynically holding the lid on. It is a sincere ideology.
If the problem of race were stable, ignoring it would be one thing. But it is getting worse, which is another. We see now what amounts to a race war of low intensity. Is there a nicer way of putting it? Maybe “an inter-pigmental conflictual situation.” But across the country there occur hundreds of attacks against whites by ferals, and they are brutal attacks. We are not talking of black eyes and bloody noses. These are assaults by gangs of, er, teens who repeatedly kick the victim in the head while laughing about it.
If you doubt this, I suggest reading White Girl Bleed a Lot, by Colin Flaherty.
It is spreading. It does not meet resistance. That is why it is spreading.