Home / Federal Reserve / “We’re Flying Blind,” Says Federal Reserve President.
Print Friendly and PDF

“We’re Flying Blind,” Says Federal Reserve President.

Written by Gary North on November 6, 2012

Gary North’s Reality Check (Nov. 6, 2012)

Eric S. Rosengren, the president of the Boston Federal Reserve Bank, recently gave a speech at Babson College on November 1. That was a good place to give it. Founder Roger Babson in September, 1929, warned of a stock market crash. Wikipedia reports: “On September 5, 1929, he gave a speech saying, “Sooner or later a crash is coming, and it may be terrific.” Later that day the stock market declined by about 3%. This became known as the “Babson Break”. The Wall Street Crash of 1929 and the Great Depression soon followed.”

Dr. Rosengren began:

Today I plan to highlight three main points about the economic outlook. I always like to emphasize that my remarks represent my views, not necessarily those of my colleagues on the Federal Open Market Committee or at the Board of Governors.A first point is this: while it is still early to gauge the full impact of the Federal Reserve’s September monetary policy committee decision to begin an open-ended mortgage-backed security purchase program, the program has so far worked as expected. The initial response in financial markets was larger than many expected. Given that our conventional monetary tool, the fed funds rate, has hit its lower bound of zero, we have turned to unconventional monetary policy. By that I mean policy that attempts to affect long-term interest rates directly, via asset purchases, rather than indirectly by setting the short-term interest rate, as in conventional policy.

Translation: “Federal Reserve policy has not been working for three years. The FedFunds rate is just above zero. That is because commercial banks have $1.6 trillion at the FED in excess reserves. So, the FedFunds rate is just over zero. In the good old days, the FED pumped in money to get this rate down. These days, it stays down, no matter what FED policy is. So, we had to target another rate. Otherwise, the investing public would conclude that the FED is impotent — kind of like the Bank of Japan has been since 1990.”

Unconventional policy has affected financial markets much like movements of conventional policy would have. Our use of unconventional policy tools has led to lower longer-term interest rates; higher equity prices; and, in a peripheral by-product of lower U.S. rates, exchange-rate effects.

Translation: “Believe me. Rates fell. Here is the proof. On September 12, the 30-year T-bond rate was 2.92%. On September 13, the FOMC announced QE3. The rate went to 2.95% by the close of the day. It was at 3.09% On September 14. But ignore that. On November 1, it was 2.89%. See? It was way down: three one-hundredths of a percent.

“So, the policy had no measurable effect on long-term T-bond rates. But so what? We want you to think that we are on top of things, steering the economy in the right direction.”

He bragged that the policy had goosed the bond market. It hadn’t. He said that it goosed the stock market. For a while, yes.

Is it the FED’s job to manipulate the stock market? It appears so. Otherwise, why take credit for it?

By further easing financial conditions, the Fed’s actions appear to be providing additional stimulus to the household sector — as witnessed recently by higher consumer confidence, and increases in purchases of interest-sensitive items such as new homes and cars.

What was the cause? How do we know? He was bluffing. For one thing, the FED’s monetary base shrank for three weeks after the press release. In early November, it was still below what it was on September 13.

The FED president seemed unaware of all this. But he marched forward, oblivious.

Certainly, concerns about such issues as the looming “fiscal cliff” in the U.S. and slow growth in many developed countries do appear to be depressing business spending. Still, our actions are likely to spur faster economic growth than we would have had without this additional stimulus — and, as you know, economic growth has been painfully slow.

This is a statement of Keynesian faith in the face of policies that have not produced much success in four years.

My second point is that the increased quantity of bank reserves that resulted from these unconventional monetary policy actions have not resulted in inflation above our 2 percent target.

Translation: “Banks are not lending. Businesses are not borrowing. The economy is stagnant. The M1 multiplier remains flat. So, consumer prices are flat. That is what economic stagnation does in recessions and weak recoveries.”

(For the rest of the translation, click the link.)

Continue Reading on www.garynorth.com

Print Friendly and PDF

Posting Policy:
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.

4 thoughts on ““We’re Flying Blind,” Says Federal Reserve President.

  1. Rabelrouser says:

    So basically, what he is saying in Fed Speak is essentially this:
    The economy continues to shrink and we have manipulated the minds of businesses so that we can continue to slowly, but surely arrive at the end game of a financial collapse that will allow our greater plan of total economic slavery to be complete.
    Untill this fraud that is the Federal Reserve is understood by the people and fought against wholeheartedly, the economy will continue to die and conditions for the average citizen will continue to get worse.
    Hopefully, now that the election is about over, the america people will come back to their senses and start to focus on the real and driving problem of the nation.
    I doubt it, this type of fraud is too complex for them to understand.

  2. America needs to get away from the fed of course, but more importantly we need to get away from the gambling of wallstreet. Why are men gambling the price of oil will rise and then profit when it does? Aplly this thought to food and everything else we need to live. This system will end eventually. Our government is helping to soften the landing ( crash ) with what they call quantatative easing. This is a system where a series of large amounts of money are injected in the economy to prop it up long enough to keep us silly Americans from seeing we are a broke third world country. Add together the progressive rate of immorality and soon we will be a poor, violent, and corrupt country much like Mexico.

  3. Bill Smith says:

    I’m 71 years old. When I was a kid “stimulating the economy” worked to some extent because the money was spent and circulated among our people many times since we had an economy based on manufacturing. Now the money is spent on products manufactured overseas, or the money is soaked up by the corrupt banking industry. We have painted ourselves into a corner where there is no sensible solution.

  4. Bob Marshall says:

    Bill, i am 69 and i agree with you. Some of your points have been pointed out in the November issue of whilsteblower publication. Someone needs to as how well has 'free trade" worked out for America? NAFTA and CAFTA are just two examples.