Home / Civil Rights / A Federal Data Base on Where Your Car Has Been . . . Ever
Print Friendly and PDF

A Federal Data Base on Where Your Car Has Been . . . Ever

Written by Gary North on October 26, 2012

This report is from Kate Crockford. She has raised some interesting questions.

Imagine a searchable database that would enable police or federal agents to instantly track everywhere you’ve ever driven in your car, like a “Google search” of your location over a period of months or even years. According to a law enforcement data manager speaking at a 2010 National Institute of Justice conference, that’s where the government is headed.

A driver location “Google search” is not available to police today because there aren’t enough license plate readers to ensure total information awareness about our driving habits. But if the federal government’s seed funding of the surveillance camera boom over the past ten years is any indication of where we are headed with license plate readers—and we have evidence to suggest a similar process is unfolding—we will get there soon enough.

The police are preparing for it, too. Dale Stockton, Program Manager of the “Road Runner” project at the Automated Regional Justice Information System in San Diego spoke on a panel on license readers at the 2010 conference and explained to police and prosecutors in attendance how best to share license plate data. Mind you, he was talking about the location information of people never accused of any crime.

Aware that a “centralized national giant bucket of license plate reader data…probably wouldn’t stand the court of public opinion,” he suggested a number of backdoor alternatives that would grant the government the same power to spy on us retroactively and with frightening precision. No such centralized data system exists and probably won’t, he said, but he described other paths towards total information awareness regarding license plate data, among them a “regional sharing capability” that in 2010 already existed in San Diego and L.A. Another option is informal data sharing between police departments, Stockton said, encouraging “anyone involved in LPR in the interim to establish an e-mail group and do an e-mail blast when you have a vehicle of interest. This is working in the southwest area of the United States,” he said.

But the regional data sharing and the informal e-mail systems Stockton described pale in comparison to the real endgame, what he called “something akin to a Google.” Not “a storage unit” per se—because remember, such a centralized database “wouldn’t stand the court of public opinion”—but a “pointer system” that would enable agencies to store their own data locally while making it readily available to police departments and federal agencies nationwide at the click of a button.

Central storage of data vs. distributed storage indexed via a pointer system? When it comes to privacy, that’s a distinction without a difference.

As license plate scanners proliferate nationwide, boring questions regarding data retention and sharing take on great importance. Unfortunately, it appears as if the government is taking us in precisely the wrong direction, from the top, down.

We’ve been making a lot of noise about location tracking of late. License plate readers rank high among the technologies that are threatening our privacy with respect to our travel patterns. Where we go says a lot about who we are, and law enforcement agencies nationwide are increasingly obtaining detailed information about where we go without any judicial oversight or reason to believe we are up to no good. Stockton says we have nothing to worry about with respect to license plate reader data and privacy, that that’s all “hocus pocus.” But he’s wrong.

We must ensure license plate readers do not become license plate trackers.

She notes that the Department of Justice told a court last week that Americans have “no privacy interest” in our location information as it pertains to our cellphones.

I think they do have such a privacy interest.

Continue Reading on www.aclu.org

Print Friendly and PDF

Posting Policy:
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.

7 thoughts on “A Federal Data Base on Where Your Car Has Been . . . Ever

  1. Gene W 1938 says:

    Forget plate scanners … cars have smart tags and interactive radios … they also track locations of your cell phones and detects moving traffic for traffic reports.

    Cameras in public locations are also capable to detect individual that are on a search list. Many resort locations have these installed to monitor those in away from home hiding.

    Big brother is here and healthy.

  2. This is always the end result when the public sector finally overtakes the private sector: you have millions of bureaucrats who contribute nothing to society dreaming up more ways to micromanage the population.


  4. Big brother is a Dictator alive and well in the W H

  5. GOVRNMENT, GET OUT OF MY FACE AND MY SPACE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  6. Well you don't have to buy these vehicles that have all this crap in them. I don't own any. My trucks from 1972 are easy to maintain and cheap to insure and register. My wife has a 2005 Saturn View that has very little of these capabilities as well. I'll just stick with the older models. 🙂

  7. Texas Chris says:

    I don't have a problem with a private company doing things like this. They are attempting to market to me that which I might choose to buy. I can always opt out by not buying their product, right?

    But when government 1) forces a company to collect information on me, 2) forces a company to turn over that information, or 3) collects that information on me directly, then it has violated it's constitutional authority and has declared itself my enemy.

    I reserve the right to take any action necessary to prevent the government from gathering that information.