Home / Civil Rights / Police Erase Video of an Officer Who Killed a Speeder
Print Friendly and PDF

Police Erase Video of an Officer Who Killed a Speeder

Written by Gary North on September 28, 2012

A Texas policeman fired 41 shots at a man who had led the police on a wild chase. The man died.

A person who lived on the street where the incident took place took videos of the shooting. The police saw him doing this. They demanded that he turn over the cell phone to them. The cell phone was returned four days later. The section of the disk devoted to the shooting was erased.

This is suppression of evidence. It is illegal according to some federal courts.

The legal question is this: Is there a federal law that covers all incidents? Or is it merely laws in some jurisdictions?

The Supreme Court will eventually have to decide. The issue: If it is illegal for private citizens to erase evidence, what about the police?

My guess is that the Supreme Court will side with the private citizen who records the incident. If this turns out to be true, the police will have to follow the law when conducting their public activities.

The spread of cell phones with cameras is a threat to law enforcement agencies that do not obey the law. Cell phones reduce the privacy of those who use them. The phones record where they are at any time. But the phones also are a tool of defense of individual liberties. There is nothing like a YouTube video to put the fear of bad publicity in the hearts of public employees.

On the whole, citizens are ahead in the digital wars.


Continue Reading on www.pixiq.com

Print Friendly and PDF

Posting Policy:
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.

6 thoughts on “Police Erase Video of an Officer Who Killed a Speeder

  1. "My guess is that the Supreme Court will side with the private citizen who records the incident."
    This would certainly be a departure for the "Roberts court" which seems to want to go down in history as a rubber stamp for the expansion of federal power. Thinking of the Kelo, Citizens United and Obamacare decisions.

  2. Guess they dont have to have a warrant any more to take private property. Wonder when people are going to say ENOUGH! You can't blame Bush for all of this going on now! And the present administration does not care what the citizens want. Well, the legal ones anyway.

  3. if the public is being watched by the gov. by traffic cameras or by camera on the streets we walk on, then the police have no complaint about their movement being on camera

  4. Gary: I have repeatedly ask that you unsubscribe my email address.

  5. Can you imagine how many of the streetcam tapes are selectively erased?

  6. how true and how wrong and it sucks to be powerless ovr this suck butted government