I thought the exact same thing when I saw this interview. It's like "let him finish a sentence!' He clearly get's frustrated, and wants to explain how the "economic machine works". Does he know the economy is not a machine? When he says we are flying into "air pockets", does he know the economy is not a plane, with inanimate objects as its constituent parts? Does he understand the economy is a dynamic system made up of individuals with their own goals and ambitions?

No, he thinks it's a "machine" or "plane" and guess who he wants to be in the captain's seat? Here's a hint: It aint you.

I got it: the interviewer is part of the D-cup-bimbo brigade the networks erroneously believe is going to win back all the discerning thoughtful viewers & readers they have lost to the alternative media. If she had let Dalio complete a sentence and follow through a logical train of thought, it would have been processed by everyone else present and created an insurmountable expectation in Mz. Bartiromo. She would then have had the burden of formulating an intelligent follow-up question, but that would require her to know something about the subject under discussion.

The network news readers can hold their own if the topic is salacious tabloid gossip and Hollywood celebrities, but they're instantly out of their depth when it's a pressing issue of national importance. Nothing but teeth, hair, makeup and wardrobe.