Home / Bureaucracy / Showdown Over Illegal Immigration: ICE Agents Sue Janet Napolitano
Print Friendly and PDF

Showdown Over Illegal Immigration: ICE Agents Sue Janet Napolitano

Written by Gary North on August 27, 2012

President Obama’s executive order on illegal immigration breaks existing federal laws on immigration. So say the President of the Immigration and Customs  Enforcement Agents and Officers Union and nine other agents. They have taken their case into the federal courts. They are suing the head of the Department of Homeland Security, who is enforcing the new executive order.

This will force the courts to decide if Obama’s unilateral decision to the defer removal of illegals under age 30 who have not been sent back is legal. The agents say they are being asked to break the existing immigration law.

Congress has not complained, so bureaucrats inside the enforcement agency are doing Congress’s work for it.

The plaintiffs claim that there are 1.6 million illegals who have just been granted the right to stay here.

If a President can revoke the enforcement of a federal law, then this will further the substitution of administrative law for legislative law.  The goal of this substitution is to end the existing Constitutional division of powers between the executive and Congress.

The lawsuit alleges the following.

4. The Directive commands ICE officers to violate federal law, as detailed below, commands ICE officers to violate their oaths to uphold and support federal law, violates the Administrative Procedure Act, unconstitutionally usurps and encroaches upon the legislative powers of Congress, as defined in Article I of the United States Constitution, and violates the obligation of the executive branch to faithfully execute the law, as required by Article II, Section 3, of the United States Constitution.

5. Plaintiffs bring this civil action to seek injunctive relief preventing the implementation of this unlawful and unconstitutional Directive.

6. This lawsuit seeks to prevent law enforcement officer Plaintiffs from being forced to either violate federal law if they comply with the unlawful Directive or risk adverse employment action if they disobey the unlawful orders of the DHS Secretary. This lawsuit also seeks to preserve the balance of legislative and executive powers established by the United States Constitution. . . .

30. According to official estimates provided on August 16, 2012, by the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act, the number of aliens unlawfully present in the United States who qualify for the benefits offered by the Directive is estimated to be 1.76 million. . . .

31. According to the Department of Homeland Security, the number of aliens unlawfully present in the United States is estimated to be 11.5 million. . . .

36. Deferred action is not specifically authorized anywhere in federal law. Historically, deferred action has been utilized sparsely for small numbers of aliens in discrete distress pending statutory or foreign policy-mandated regulatory changes. No group of aliens has been granted deferred action in the past 15 years that approaches a fraction of the size of the class of aliens subject to the Directive. . . .

41. Plaintiffs have each sworn an oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States and the laws of the United States.

42. Plaintiffs believe that if they follow the Directive, they will be violating their oath of office, as well as violating several laws of the United States.

43. Plaintiffs reasonably fear, based upon official communications to them, their knowledge of communications to Plaintiff Doebler, Plaintiff Martin, and Plaintiff Crane from their superiors, past events, and public sources, that if they follow the requirements of federal law, contrary to the “Directive,” and arrest an alien or issue an alien an Notice to Appear (NTA) in removal proceedings, they will be disciplined or suffer other adverse employment consequences. . . .

46. On July 17, 2012, Plaintiff Samuel Martin, along with another immigration enforcement agent, picked up an illegal alien from the El Paso County Jail. While the agents were trying to place the alien in the vehicle, the alien attempted to escape, and resisted and assaulted Plaintiff Martin and his colleague. The agents regained custody of the alien and transported him to the El Paso Criminal Alien Program office for processing. Plaintiff Martin’s supervisors ordered him to release the alien without any charges being filed against the alien and ordered Plaintiff Martin not to issue an NTA. The agents who were present protested the release of the alien; but they were told “it was a management decision, based on the President’s new immigration policies.” No supervisor ever asked the agents if they were injured or if they needed assistance. It is the understanding of Plaintiff Martin, reflected in his signed statement concerning the incident, that his supervisors gave him these orders based on the Directive.

Continue Reading on www.numbersusa.com

Print Friendly and PDF

Posting Policy:
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.

17 thoughts on “Showdown Over Illegal Immigration: ICE Agents Sue Janet Napolitano

  1. Delmar Jackson says:

    Thanks for the immigration post Dr North, and God Bless Governor Brewer and Numbersusa.

  2. Sounds like open boarders to me.

  3. God Bless these agents for what they are going. May God Protect Them.

  4. All the more reason to vote Obama out of office!

  5. The fact that Obama won the presidency in 2008 by a clear majority shows that Americans who feel as Dr. North and Gov. Brewer (and myself) do are in the minority now. Never would I have dreamed that a candidate whose origins and qualifications to be president are so obscure and clouded with doubt — plus having a middle name Hussein that instantly conjures up associations with Saddam — could win the highest office in a landslide. The people who trace their heritage back to the country's founding don't count anymore.

  6. The agents have a case. While I agree that we need to address the issue of children who were brought to the US by their illegal parents, the means to address this cannot be done administratively. It must be addressed by the Congress in changes to the laws. As a former federal official, I would be very uncomfortable violating the law to comply with a Presidential Executive Order.

  7. My question is, are you one of the few that wouldn't comply?? I hope not for our country's sake. And ours!

  8. Ernest T. says:

    If Obama refuses to enforce federal law impeach him , or in the least vote him out. He is not doing his job.

  9. So if the president broke the law ,how come he hasn’t been arrested ?

  10. Comply with which, the law or the President? The ICE agents are between a rock and a hard place. They are sworn to uphold the law and must also obey their boss, the President, or be fired. The issue becomes, what is a lawful order? I applaud the agents. They have courage and I believe they will win in court.

  11. This is Congress's job. They are violating their oath every day that they allow this to continue. They should have been in the forefront, charging Napolitano with Contempt of Congress the instant she did anything that supported this unconstitutional executive order.

  12. About time someone stood up to the Obama Dictatorship ! They are working hard to only one goal , bankrupt and destroy America !

  13. I don't usually agree with UNIONS, but in this case I am pulling for them because RIGHT is on their side in this case. Why have Immigration Laws if they're not going to be enforced AND most of WE the people know we need them to be enforced!

  14. Blair Franconia, NH says:

    Obama and Napolitano will get ICED in November.

  15. Daniel from TN says:

    Actually, obama did not win in 2008. It is now known that ballot box stuffing in two states produced obama’s “win.” These incidents were known in 2008 before the elections in those states were certified but McCain ordered all his staff to remain quiet because McCain did not want to win.

  16. Good luck on that one, unless the people stop believing the media's lies & wake up to the reality of the fixed voting, nothing will change…
    God have mercy on the USA

  17. sean murry says:

    Congress hasnt a pair of balls get a spine and hold the SOB for treason.