The old line about the National Security Agency is that it’s so secretive, the FBI and the CIA don’t have high enough security clearance to find out what it does.
It is also said that the acronym, NSA, means “No Such Agency.”
The best book on it is James Bamford’s The Puzzle Palace.
The NSA spies on Americans. It spies on their telecommunications.
It has done this for decades. But now, because of anti-terrorism legislation, it has a blank check. It always did, but this has made it official.
You may be interested to know just how many Americans the NSA has files on. If so, you are not alone. Two U.S. Senators are also interested. So, they asked.
Can you imagine anything this silly?
The two Senators thought they had a “need to know.” After all, they are members of the Senate’s intelligence oversight committee. So, they asked the NSA a simple question last month: “Under the broad powers granted in 2008′s expansion of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, how many persons inside the United States have been spied upon by the NSA?”
The NSA did not answer. After all, it does not exist. Someone else answered for it: Charles McCullough, who holds the office of Inspector General of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. This is supposedly the head of all 16 of America’s spy agencies. Well, all 15 of them. NSA does not exist.
Answer: request denied. Such information “would itself violate the privacy of U.S. persons,” McCullough wrote.
Besides, even if such an agency existed, it would be far beyond its capacity to find out that sort of information. It would have to have a computer and a data base program. So, McCulloch said, “I defer to [the non-existent NSA’s non-existent inspector general’s] conclusion that obtaining such an estimate was beyond the capacity of his office and dedicating sufficient additional resources would likely impede the NSA’s mission.”
A journalist at Wired, who actually thinks that the NSA exists, has written this:
The changes to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act in 2008 — which President Obama, then in the Senate, voted for — relaxed the standards under which communications with foreigners that passed through the United States could be collected by the spy agency. The NSA, for instance, no longer requires probable cause to intercept a person’s phone calls, text messages or emails within the United States as long as one party to the communications is “reasonably” believed to be outside the United States.
The FISA Amendments Act of 2008, as it’s known, legalized an expansive effort under the Bush administration that authorized NSA surveillance on persons inside the United States without a warrant in cases of suspicion of connections to terrorism.
The 2008 law expires this year. If it is not renewed, the NSA would no longer be protected, if it existed, and people could sue it in court. Then the NSA would say that it would violate your privacy to respond.
(For more information about this fictitious agency, click the link.)
Does not bother me one bit! I know that our Hebrew-inspired CREATOR is in charge of everything and it's his two-witnesses that take care of u.s., not Obama or even Islam. In fact, Revelation is clear on this. In fact, Revelation 16 reveals that it's our Savior that destroys Islam immediately upon his return, because his two-witnesses have already punished u.s. by that time. As witten, YHWH ALWAYS PUNISHES HIS OWN FIRST! Just saying…
What planet did you come from?
IF NASA DOES NOT EXIST WHY ARE WE SPENDING SO MUCH MONEY ON IT CONGRESS MUST FINED OUT WHERE IT IS GOING IT IS LIKE THE C I A AND ALL OF THERE PROGRAMS NOBODY KNOWS OR DO NOT CARE MONEY SPEND TO SPY ON THE PEOPLE OF THE U S A IS MORE LIKE A POLICE STATE AND AGAINST THE CONSTITUTION AND BILL OF RIGHTS THE CHIP AND NEW SCANNERS AND CARDS ARE AGAINST THE LAW CONTROL OF THE PEOPLE ARE WE SO AFRAID OF EACH OTHER THAT WE ARE WILLING TO LET THE GOVERNMENT ENSLAVE US WITH OUT A WHIMPER ALL FOR THE GOOD OF ALL MY OPINION
I didn't see any rules against "homophobic" comments. Good for you for at least not including that ridiculous made-up-out-of-thin-air catagory.
1. Listen to TruNews with Rick Wiles.
2. Listen to The PowerHour with Joyce Riley.
3. Don't vote for ANY evil (greater or lesser).
The phrase "U.S. persons" refers to Charles McCullough and his cronies.
You believe you understand the Bible. YOu believe you know the end times. But Jesus stated that not even he knew, but only the Father in Heaven. So have you become God. NO NO NO. You have been preceded by so many others who have fulfilled the prophesy that says, "When they say He is here, don't go there." Paraphrased. You don't know anything but you don't know that you don't know.
NSA, not NASA. Look up the two. There is a difference. LOL
Those you are following are leading you into destruction. Not voting is the worst thing you can do. And if you vote for anyone these, you are voting for an evil, greater or lesser. So don't vote. Then you can say nothing about the outcome because you did nothing to change it.
Dale, Part 1: Don't really know that you will understand what I'm about to say, but I'll try to explain: First, "Hebrew" is the ONLY inspired Spiritual language, as written in Zeph. 3:9, Acts 26:14, & 1 Cor. 4:6, In fact if you read those verses alone you should understand that the people were looking at the Hebrew to see if these things were true! Also, Petrus Galatinus, came up with the name "Jesus," a GREEK Name to honor "Zeus," because it always was the tradition of Rome to honor the highest deities of those countries that they had conquered, Greece being the last.
Obviously if it were "Jesus" then, they couldn't have verified it in the Hebrew, because "Jesus" can not even be translated into Hebrew! I also want to mention that the Bible, as people call it, also commands that it only is to be read through the process of SCIENTIFIC DEDUCTION(2 Peter 1:20), not induction, as the Roman Catholic Church & daughter's that came out of her began to do, but also were wrong in doing it, according to the Book itself! In reality, according to the "Hebrew," which is what we must use to prove all things, proves that Rome created a "false" religion to honor Rome, not Jerusalem. I could go on and on, but if you aren't called, it will do no good. But as written "prove all things," which requires one to prove the New with the Hebrew Old and through ONLY SCIENTIFIC DEDUCTION, also as written! Hope that this did help some?