Home / Congress / Here Comes SOPA 2: More Controls on Our Privacy
Print Friendly and PDF

Here Comes SOPA 2: More Controls on Our Privacy

Written by Gary North on March 12, 2012

Because of the organized resistance by Wikipedia, Google, and other large Internet companies, the Congress scrapped the SOPA bill. It had been scheduled to pass without protest.

Congress is not going to let that minor skirmish derail its long-term policy of suppressing the Internet. The Electronic Freedom Foundation has issued an alert.

Congress is doing it again: they’re proposing overbroad regulations that could have dire consequences for our Internet ecology. The Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act of 2011 (H.R. 3523), introduced by Rep. Mike Rogers and Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger, allows companies or the government1 free rein to bypass existing laws in order to monitor communications, filter content, or potentially even shut down access to online services for “cybersecurity purposes.” Companies are encouraged to share data with the government and with one another, and the government can share data in return. The idea is to facilitate detection of and defense against a serious cyber threat, but the definitions in the bill go well beyond that. The language is so broad it could be used as a blunt instrument to attack websites like The Pirate Bay or WikiLeaks. Join EFF in calling on Congress to stop the Rogers’ cybersecurity bill.

Under the proposed legislation, a company that protects itself or other companies against “cybersecurity threats” can “use cybersecurity systems to identify and obtain cyber threat information to protect the rights and property” of the company under threat. But because “us[ing] cybersecurity systems” is incredibly vague, it could be interpreted to mean monitoring email, filtering content, or even blocking access to sites. A company acting on a “cybersecurity threat” would be able to bypass all existing laws, including laws prohibiting telcos from routinely monitoring communications, so long as it acted in “good faith.”

The broad language around what constitutes a cybersecurity threat leaves the door wide open for abuse. For example, the bill defines “cyber threat intelligence” and “cybersecurity purpose” to include “theft or misappropriation of private or government information, intellectual property, or personally identifiable information.”

Yes, intellectual property. It’s a little piece of SOPA wrapped up in a bill that’s supposedly designed to facilitate detection of and defense against cybersecurity threats. The language is so vague that an ISP could use it to monitor communications of subscribers for potential infringement of intellectual property. An ISP could even interpret this bill as allowing them to block accounts believed to be infringing, block access to websites like The Pirate Bay believed to carry infringing content, or take other measures provided they claimed it was motivated by cybersecurity concerns.

The language of “theft or misappropriation of private or government information” is equally concerning. Regardless of the intent of this language, the end result is that the government and Internet companies could use this language to block sites like WikiLeaks and NewYorkTimes.com, both of which have published classified information. Online publishers like WikiLeaks are currently afforded protection under the First Amendment; receiving and publishing classified documents from a whistleblower is a common journalistic practice. While there’s uncertainty about whether the Espionage Act could be brought to bear against WikiLeaks, it is difficult to imagine a situation where the Espionage Act would apply to WikiLeaks without equally applying to the New York Times, the Washington Post, and in fact everyone who reads about the cablegate releases. But under Rogers’ cybersecurity proposal, the government would have new, powerful tools to go after WikiLeaks. By claiming that WikiLeaks constituted “cyber threat intelligence” (aka “theft or misappropriation of private or government information”), the government may be empowering itself and other companies to monitor and block the site. This means that the previous tactics used to silence WikiLeaks—including a financial blockade and shutting down their accounts with online service providers—could be supplemented by very direct means. The government could proclaim that WikiLeaks constitutes a cybersecurity threat and have new, broad powers to filter and block communication with the journalistic website.

Congress is intent on passing cybersecurity legislation this year, and there are multiple proposals in the House and the Senate under debate. But none is as poorly drafted and dangerously vague as the Rogers bill. We need to stop this bill in its tracks, before it can advance in the House and before the authors can negotiate to place this overbroad language into other cybersecurity proposals.

 

Continue Reading on www.eff.org

Print Friendly and PDF

Posting Policy:
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.

11 thoughts on “Here Comes SOPA 2: More Controls on Our Privacy

  1. JeepDiver says:

    Great article (five Stars), but sad that this is where our government "officials" are continuing to take us (negative stars). Heres to hopeing the Tea Party continues to live strong, conservatives banding together against bi-partisanship, and people keep waking up to the corruption and lack of morals, vaules, and integrity that so many of our so called leaders have chosen to embrace.

  2. It is so sad that there are so many Obama A– kissers in the congress. Time to revolt.

  3. Espionage Act should apply to (Vivek Kundra) – Information Czar
 Born in  New Delhi,  India. Controls all public information, including labels and news releases. Monitors all private Internet emails. (HELLO?)

  4. http://www.trunews.com with rick Wiles.
    The PowerHour with Joyce Riley.
    The RobertScottBell Show.
    ***URGENT***

  5. Definately urgent.

  6. TheGovtIsNuts says:

    Google is a Traitor!

    The Real Reasons Google Killed SOPA/PIPA, and Supported the Far More Evil CISPA Instead
    http://www.forbes.com/sites/scottcleland/2012/01/

    Expect Google to use its recently-flexed, and newly-appreciated online muscle, as the real political power behind the Internet throne, to continue to thwart enforcement of the rule of law on piracy, property rights, privacy and antitrust.

  7. WebSentinel says:

    Tell the Senate to STOP CISPA!

    How CISPA Will Ruin YOUR Life, details at http://news.cnet.com/8301-31921_3-57422693-281/ho

    CISPA would "waive every single privacy law ever enacted in the name of cybersecurity," Rep. Jared Polis, a Colorado Democrat and onetime Web entrepreneur, said during the debate. "Allowing the military and NSA to spy on Americans on American soil goes against every principle this country was founded on."

  8. tHEgOVTiSnUTS! says:

    May 11, 2012 – SOPA IS BAAAAACK!

    See TechDirt article, http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120510/0325011

    Make no mistake: while the public has no access to, or information about, what the federal government is negotiating, the big special interests are well informed. As pressure has been mounting against TPP, it appears that the US Chamber of Commerce has "brought the band back together," putting outa letter to the Obama administration explaining why draconian IP rules must be included in the TPP. The letter is signed by a who's who of SOPA supporters, including (of course) the Chamber of Commerce, the MPAA, the RIAA, A2IM, PhRMA, AAP, BSA, ESA and more.

    Basically, it's a bunch of also ran industry trade groups whining to the feds that they can't innovate anymore and they need economically damaging mercantilist-style protectionism.

  9. No Secret Law says:

    Internet privacy should be the default, not the exception.

    Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) hits it out of the park, video (12 min), http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120522/1055081

  10. Privacy Is Awesome says:

    DEFEAT CISPA!

    Contact Your Representatives this Memorial Day Weekend 2012.

    Privacy Is Awesome, http://www.privacyisawesome.com/