Home / Civil Rights / Without Syria, Where Can the U.S. Government Send Us to Be Tortured?
Print Friendly and PDF

Without Syria, Where Can the U.S. Government Send Us to Be Tortured?

Written by Gary North on February 27, 2012

It’s really tough on Obama. Syria used to be the destination of choice for Americans to be sent to be tortured. Now, with all the bad press about Assad killing protesters, it’s bad public relations to fly Americans to Syria for torture. Assad is now officially a dictator, whereas before he was a partner.

You think I’m making this up? Nobody could make this up. Think of Mahar Arar.

On 26 September 2002, he was arrested at JFK airport in New York, where he had been in transit, on his way home to Canada after a family holiday abroad. Following 13 days of questioning, the US authorities, suspecting Arar of ties to al-Qaida based on flawed Canadian police intelligence, “rendered” him not to Canada, where he lived, but to his native Syria, from where his family had fled 15 years earlier.

For the next 10 months, he was detained without charge in a three-foot by six-foot Syrian prison cell where, according to the findings of an official Canadian commission of inquiry, he was tortured. Arar says he was punched, kicked and whipped with an electrical cable during 18-hour interrogation sessions. He received C$10.5m in compensation from the Canadian government and a formal apology from prime minister Stephen Harper for the country’s role in his ordeal. . . .

US officials cannot feign ignorance. They had every reason to believe the Syrians would abuse Arar. Six months earlier, in March 2002, the US state department’s human rights report on Syria had concluded that “continuing serious abuses include the use of torture in detention”. Arar claims his Syrian torturers were supplied with specific questions by the US government; he was asked the exact same questions in Damascus he had been asked in New York.

After his release, in October 2003, both Syria and Canada publicly cleared Arar of any links to terrorism. But the US government – first under Bush, and now under Obama – refuses to discuss the matter, let alone apologise. The Arar case wasn’t a one-off. According to the New Yorker’s Jane Mayer, who has spent much of the past decade investigating what she calls “the dark side” of the war on terror, Syria was one of the “most common” destinations for rendered suspects. Or, in the chilling words of former CIA agent Robert Baer, in 2004: “If you want a serious interrogation, you send a prisoner to Jordan. If you want them to be tortured, you send them to Syria.”

This case was not unique, as the article explains.

Mohammed Haydar Zammar, a Syrian-born German citizen and alleged al-Qaida recruiter, was arrested in Morocco in October 2001 and rendered by the CIA to Syria, where he was held incommunicado in the notorious Far’Falastin detention centre. “US officials in Damascus submit written questions to the Syrians, who relay Zammar’s answers back,” reported Time magazine in July 2002. “State department officials like the arrangement because it insulates the US government from any torture the Syrians may be applying to Zammar.”

The evidence is overwhelming: in the months and years after 9/11, the US collaborated closely with Syria, which became an ally in the war on terror and a frequent destination for victims of extraordinary rendition. Syrian torturers worked hand in hand with US interrogators.

These days, however, US politicians from across the spectrum piously condemn the Syrian regime for its crimes against humanity; two weeks ago, a bipartisan group of senators introduced a resolution condemning Assad for “gross human rights violations” and the use of “torture”. Who says Americans don’t do irony, eh?

And Arar? He’s still on a US no-fly list. Some things, it seems, never change.

This article appeared in a British publication. To read the full article, click the link.

Continue Reading on www.guardian.co.uk

Print Friendly and PDF

Posting Policy:
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.

2 thoughts on “Without Syria, Where Can the U.S. Government Send Us to Be Tortured?

  1. Why would I believe Time Magazine or their, presumably Syrian sources or the victim in this case? Since when was Syria a friend of the US? What "overwhelming evidence"? This is not evidence its Time Magazine. Why would I believe Time Magazine or their, presumably Syrian sources or the victim in this case? Since when was Syria a friend of the US? What "overwhelming evidence"? This is not evidence its Time Magazine.
    One was apparently a suspicious Muslim, a Syrian national apparently, in the US. Its not OUR fault the CANADIANS screwed up, if they did.
    I was not aware that the CIA had arrest powers in Morocco. If a GERMAN citizen was spirited off to Syria where was the German Gov't in all this? The Moroccan gov't just grabbed this guy at random off the street?
    Since every Muslim is suspect based on the events of the distant and recent past what is to be done?
    Maybe Muslims with foreign citizenship should not travel through the US. For all we know he WAS an enemy courier.
    Islam IS the enemy after all. This is patently clear from their actions and statements for CENTURIES. The difference between a peaceful Muslim and a Radical one in only a matter of degrees. Islam is not a religion its a form of GOVERNMENT disguised as a religion. It allows religious leaders to wield immense power. Something I am sure Mohammed fully understood being the leader…
    So these deportations to Syria has not produced any results at all and these are the only ones who were sent to Syria?

    The actions of various Muslim men and women over the past 50 years alone has put my Constitutional and natural rights in extreme danger.Their "threat" which we refuse to adequately deal with on foreign soil has resulted in increasingly draconian laws and decrees on ME, HERE, not the actual enemy.
    People wail about things like this but refuse to discuss the CORE PROBLEM than is the CAUSE. The cause is the Muslim belief that they can tell any lie and commit any atrocity against the "infidel" in the name of Allah and they will be rewarded. This is a war to the death folks and WE are currently losing. Mostly because we have become to civilized and/or PC to adequately defend ourselves.

  2. victor barney says:

    How about Egypt? Just saying…