Home / Politics / Fun and Games in Vote-Counting in South Carolina
Print Friendly and PDF

Fun and Games in Vote-Counting in South Carolina

Written by Gary North on January 30, 2012

Here is a report by Brandon Tuberville of South Carolina.

At this time, the most serious questions are centered around the precincts in Pickens County. It was in this precinct that Chris Lawton, representing the Paul campaign, came to the Pickens County elections office to witness the vote certification and noticed a series of situations that were either in direct opposition to State voting laws, or, at the very least, highly questionable.

Mr. Lawton stated to me that he arrived at the Pickens County elections office around 7:10 pm, where he was then ushered into the County Council chambers. Mr. Lawton claims he was told that he had to remain in this area and watch the vote tabulation on the projector in the council chambers, not in the room where the actual counting was taking place.

However, Lawton noticed that, even as he arrived, the projector was displaying 726 -746 votes which were broken down by candidates. He says he then inquired as to where these votes came from and was told that the votes were tabulated at 9:00 am that day and as mail came in. He claims he was then instructed that he could not be in a secure area.

Eventually, he stated, he gathered himself together and decided to assert himself as per his rights to witness the count personally under State law. He says, “[They were] very unfriendly and appeared agitated at my presence. When I got my wits I went back and declared State law allowed me to witness all aspects of this process. I was told there was little space and [to] stand out of the way and not be talking on the phone.”

Mr. Lawton then states that at 8:00 pm a precinct which he believes to be Prater’s Creek came into the office without the “zero” tape; the device that shows the voting machines were started at a vote count of zero. Without the “zero” tape, there is no certainty that the voting machines did not begin operation loaded with votes for specific candidates, a very serious issue to say the least.

Mr. Lawton states that, at 8:02 pm, the Paul campaign called the elections office and was hung up on and given no information regarding the vote-counting process.

At 8:05 pm, Mr. Lawton claims that a box of ballots arrived (Box 216) which he believes were also from Prater’s Creek. This box had a broken security seal. When Lawton asked for the serial number of the machine that these ballots came from, he says he was told to wait.
Yet these were not the only ballots to come back unsecured. According to Lawton, the discs containing the Powdersville District 2 ballots arrived being carried by a poll worker. These discs were not only missing a seal, but were being carried in a personal folder inside the worker’s left pocket.

Shortly after a Deputy from the Pickens County Sheriff’s office arrived (as a result of the campaign being hung up on) Lawton claims that around 8:55 pm, a lady from Clemson Precinct 1 stated that the boxes and machines for this precinct were actually dropped off at another precinct – Stone Church at University Baptist Church in Clemson.

Lawton says that he asked when the machines and ballots would arrive at the correct precinct and was told that the votes had already been tabulated and would be coming in later. He claims that he was then told, later on, that the machines and ballots would be stored at the church. Lawton says that he never found out where the ballots and machines ended up before he departed his precinct Saturday night.
At 9:10 pm, Lawton claims he was given the serial number for the first box of ballots that arrived with a broken seal – Box 216 (Serial # V5124783).

At 9:30 pm, Lawton says he left the precinct with the tabulations and names of the county poll workers.

Yet Pickens County is not the only location where the method of counting votes is questionable.

In Florence County, for instance, a confidential source informed me that the vote certification was seriously flawed and essentially conducted in secret. Those individuals who came to witness the certification were not allowed into the room where the votes were being tallied and could only view the process through a glass window.
The process itself was conducted behind closed doors and witnesses could only view individuals working on computers (there were no paper ballots) – but they were unable to actually see what was on the computers themselves. Because the vote counting took place in a closed room, there was no sound available to any of the witnesses either. Only a computer screen tacked onto the wall was available for witnesses in order to view what was allegedly happening on the computers in the next room.

This is particularly concerning since the South Carolina State Constitution states that, while votes are to be cast in secret, they are to be counted in public.

It is important to note that, at no time, did the witnesses have access to the room in which the ballots were being counted to either corroborate or contest the process in Florence. There was no way for them to even ask questions regarding the vote counting.

As the source stated, “The system is designed so that just a few people have access to the votes and only a few people know what those votes actually are.”

The issue of lack of access granted to vote count witnesses seems to be a trend all across South Carolina.

There is a lot more. Click the link to find out the rest of the story.

Continue Reading on www.activistpost.com

Print Friendly and PDF

Posting Policy:
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.

8 thoughts on “Fun and Games in Vote-Counting in South Carolina

  1. You have now been schooled in one the methods taught in "How to steal an election 101".

  2. There ain't nuttin' to see here, boy. We've been a doin' this fer years. Just go on now. ( South Carolina- please vote and vote often. )

  3. The establishment is taking no chances that Ron Paul will be the Republican candidate. Iowa was off the charts for voter fraud right from the start with their governor warning Iowans that a vote for Paul was a wasted vote and continuing right through having a secret place to count the ballots and losing the ballots from several precincts, but declaring that they were ok with that because just like the missing trillions from the pentagon, they would never be found. New Hampshire has been documented as having some of the most fraudulent elections ever and then South Carolina somehow overwhelmingly chooses a man who had to cancel speaking engagments because of lack of interest. The people are watching and witnessing all of this openly blatant fraud and will not vote for another phony conservative/RINO like McCain, Gingrich, Romney or Santorum. It seems the Republican party knows this and would rather Obama get another term, than ley an honest, patriotic American like Ron Paul get elected and reveal all of their treasonous actions. Ron Paul 2012.

  4. Amazing the lengths people will go to try to steal elections .

  5. Charlotte Juett says:

    This explains why in some preciencts the exit polls showed Ron Paul was coming in second and when the votes were counted he was in last place. I am afraid that this election is fixed from the get go and the only way back to freedom is a second revolution.

  6. MontanaMEL says:

    Very disturbing to say the least!!

    Just makes the case for "extreme vigilance" during all following such primary election/ballot counting functions, eh?…

    Or…should that have been "vigilante" ???

    Powder DRY…and plenty of it….Steady hands…slow breathing….slow steady squeeze….


  7. "Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain…"

  8. jim28threg. says:

    Given who it is that hires those that supposedly count the votes this is expected. The whole process has become a sham.