Home / Regulation / Obama Kills Keystone Pipeline, Buys Off the Rich
Print Friendly and PDF

Obama Kills Keystone Pipeline, Buys Off the Rich

Written by Gary North on January 25, 2012

When President Obama killed the oil pipeline, he curried favor with the rich. The environmentalists are big-money people. William Tucker explains. “The movie stars and Sierra Club contributors were getting restless and had drawn the line in the sand.”

In turning down Keystone, however, the President has uncovered an ugly little secret that has always lurked beneath the surface of environmentalism. Its basic appeal is to the affluent. Despite all the professions of being “liberal” and “against big business,” environmentalism’s main appeal is that it promises to slow the progress of industrial progress. People who are already comfortable with the present state of affairs — who are established in the environment, so to speak — are happy to go along with this. It is not that they have any greater insight into the mysteries and workings of nature. They are happier with the way things are. In fact, environmentalism works to their advantage. The main danger to the affluent is not that they will be denied from improving their estate but that too many other people will achieve what they already have. As the Forest Service used to say, the person who built his mountain cabin last year is an environmentalist. The person who wants to build one this year is a developer.

Environmentalism has spent three decades trying to hide this simple truth. How can environmentalists be motivated by self-interest when they are anti-business? Doesn’t that align them with the working classes? Well, not quite. You can be anti-business as a union member trying to claim higher wages but you can also be anti-business as a member of the aristocracy who believes “trade” and “commercialism” are crass and not attuned to the higher things in life. Environmentalism is born from the latter, not the former. It has spent decades trying to pretend it has common cause with the working people. With the defeat of the Keystone Pipeline, this is no longer possible. Too many blue-collar and middle-class jobs have been sacrificed on the altar of carbon emissions and global warming.

This has been going on ever since Rockefeller and other elitists donated property on the elites’ Shangri-La, Mt. Desert Island in Maine. They kept the choice properties. They gave the surrounding properties to the Park Service. That way, the common people can’t buy property. This began around 1900. It has continued ever since.

Tucker goes on.

What finally focused my attention on the aristocratic roots of environmentalism, however, was a chapter in Thorstein Veblen’s Theory of the Leisure Class. Although the book is justly famous for coining “conspicuous consumption” and “conspicuous waste,” there is a lesser-known chapter entitled “Industrial Exemption” that perfectly describes the environmental zeitgeist. Veblen posed the question, why is it that people who are the greatest beneficiaries of industrial society are often the most passionate in condemning it? He provided a simple answer. People in the leisure class have become so accustomed affluence as the natural state of things that they no longer feel compelled to embrace any further industrial progress.

He explains.

Everyone weighs the balance of economic gain against a respect for nature. It is only the truly affluent, however, who can be concerned about the environment to the exclusion of everything else. Most people see the benefits of pipelines and power plants and admit they have to be built somewhere. Only in the highest echelons do we hear people say, “We don’t need to build any pipelines. We’ve already got enough energy. We can all sit around awaiting the day we live off wind and sunshine.”

Environmentalists have spent decades trying to disguise these aristocratic roots, even from themselves. They work desperately to form alliances with labor unions and cast themselves as purveyors of “green jobs.” But the Keystone Pipeline has brought all this into focus. As Joel Kotkin writes in Forbes, Keystone is the dividing line of the “two Americas,” the knowledge-based elites of the East and West Coasts in their media, non-profit and academic homelands (where Obama learned his environmentalism) and the blue-collar workers of the Great In- Between laboring in agriculture, mining, manufacturing, power production and the exigencies of material life.

Let’s hope the next President decides to reverse Obama’s decision.

Continue Reading on

Print Friendly and PDF

Posting Policy:
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.

13 thoughts on “Obama Kills Keystone Pipeline, Buys Off the Rich

  1. Let us hope the next President reverses everything this do-nothing useless administration has done. They have proven that the economy can not soar with the weight of the government upon it.

  2. Obama, pretends to be for the middle class guy? hmmmmmm, says jobs are a top priority, hmmmmm…..Keystone pipeline, 10k+ jobs, he rejects it…..hmmm. Supposedly to fail-safe the environment, yea right.

    Alaska pipeline operating for 30 years, no issues at all. It was built with a big fuss, the caribou will be harmed, etc…. Caribou actually use the pipeline for shelter and warmth and have flourished since it's building.

    Something is wrong here? look for the money trail… and know Obama will say anything, do anything for power. he's shallow evil, empty man, the devil himself. he wants to transform the country into a facist regime with us heiling him as he passes. a true megalomanic.

    he needs to be stopped, now!

  3. Amen and amen!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  4. Also Warren Buffett, he is making a lot of money through Berkshire Hathaway. Which is shipping the oil right now by train tank car. The pipeline would cost Obama’s favorite Billionaire a bunch of money.

  5. Obama has killed more jobs then most know. When he took over GMC he shut down 3000 car dealers, each had about 55 employes, do the math. He shut down the gulf drilling, that took out 20,000 jobs, plus the rigs split for other countrys. He has held down nuclear generators sites, which would employ thousands. Forcing gas and diesel pricing up put 1000's of truck companys out of business. Just a few of his accomplishment's. With leadership like this we may not make it to the next election.

  6. gary morton says:

    a shrinking American population is the answer to all of these problems. Think about it!

  7. But just think we got Volt that was a real job maker. Ha Ha

  8. Add to that thier desire, under Agenda 21, to kill off 85% of the world population within 10 years. Sound impossible, nope. Health care death panels, abortions, propagated wars; need I say more.

    Newt is the one they hate, Newt is the one we the people need. But we must turn over the Senate and Congress as well. Leave no stone unturned.

  9. Economic terrorism is defined as a: “coordinated and sophisticated or massive destabilizing actions in order to disrupt the economic and financial stability of a state, a group of states or a society (such as market oriented western societies) for ideological or religious motives. – Center of Security Policy of Geneva

    Economic Terrorism: “These actions, if undertaken, may be violent or not. They could have either immediate effects or carry psychological effects which in turn have economic consequences.” – Center of Security Policy of Geneva.

    President Obama and the Democrats have stepped over the line of political posturing to that of Economic Terrorism!

  10. LarryFrom10EC says:

    It has made a lot of jobs for firefighters.

  11. Bob Marshall says:

    I have stated this before that i have no problem with this pipe line. I asked how would the pipe line above ground be protected from terrorist? One poster said the only part above ground would be at the pumping stations. While i don't necessary believe this is true, my concern is the FBI reported that their were 35 Islamic training bases and almost as many communes in America. This was reported in 1995. How many more are in America today? America has many pipelines criss crossing our nation. A map showing these pipe lines is available on the internet.

  12. Terrorists don't have to go after pipelines,airplanes and skyscrapers. They could just as well go after the sewage systems of the major cities. That would cause just as much damage and more people would be harmed.

  13. Thought about it. I don't reach the same conclusion. Please give reasons for your statement.